Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33475800›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2021

Relative qPCR to quantify colonization of plant roots by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

Natacha Bodenhausen, Gabriel Deslandes-Hérold, Jan Waelchli, Alain Held, Marcel G A van der Heijden, Klaus Schlaeppi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Manipulating atmospheric COFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natacha BodenhausenPlant Soil Interactions, Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9680-1176
Gabriel Deslandes-HéroldInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jan WaelchliInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4384-6570
Alain HeldPlant Soil Interactions, Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marcel G A van der HeijdenPlant Soil Interactions, Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7040-1924
Klaus SchlaeppiPlant Soil Interactions, Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland. klaus.schlaeppi@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3620-0875

Funding

Gebert Rüf Stiftung GRS-072/17Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation grant C14.0132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF) are beneficial soil fungi that can promote the growth of their host plants. Accurate quantification of AMF in plant roots is important because the level of colonization is often indicative of the activity of these fungi. Root colonization is traditionally measured with microscopy methods which visualize fungal structures inside roots. Microscopy methods are labor-intensive, and results depend on the observer. In this study, we present a relative qPCR method to quantify AMF in which we normalized the AMF qPCR signal relative to a plant gene. First, we validated the primer pair AMG1F and AM1 in silico, and we show that these primers cover most AMF species present in plant roots without amplifying host DNA. Next, we compared the relative qPCR method with traditional microscopy based on a greenhouse experiment with Petunia plants that ranged from very high to very low levels of AMF root colonization. Finally, by sequencing the qPCR amplicons with MiSeq, we experimentally confirmed that the primer pair excludes plant DNA while amplifying mostly AMF. Most importantly, our relative qPCR approach was capable of discriminating quantitative differences in AMF root colonization and it strongly correlated (Spearman Rho = 0.875) with quantifications by traditional microscopy. Finally, we provide a balanced discussion about the strengths and weaknesses of microscopy and qPCR methods. In conclusion, the tested approach of relative qPCR presents a reliable alternative method to quantify AMF root colonization that is less operator-dependent than traditional microscopy and offers scalability to high-throughput analyses.

Indexed as

MycorrhizaeFungiPlant RootsPlantsSoilSoil MicrobiologySoilArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiPetuniaQuantitative PCR (qPCR)Relative quantification

Identifiers

PMID33475800
PMCPMC7910240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.