Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33475772›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Machine learning combining CT findings and clinical parameters improves prediction of length of stay and ICU admission in torso trauma.

Pedro Vinícius Staziaki, Di Wu, Jesse C Rayan, Irene Dixe de Oliveira Santo, Feng Nan, Aaron Maybury, Neha Gangasani, Ilan Benador, Venkatesh Saligrama, Jonathan Scalera and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Machine Learning and Antibiotic Management.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pedro Vinícius StaziakiDepartment of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Ave, FGH Building, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. staziaki@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3219-3815
Di WuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University College of Engineering, Boston, MA, USA.
Jesse C RayanDepartment of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Ave, FGH Building, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Irene Dixe de Oliveira SantoDepartment of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Ave, FGH Building, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Feng NanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University College of Engineering, Boston, MA, USA.
Aaron MayburyDepartment of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Ave, FGH Building, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Neha GangasaniDepartment of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Ave, FGH Building, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Ilan BenadorDepartment of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Ave, FGH Building, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Venkatesh SaligramaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University College of Engineering, Boston, MA, USA.
Jonathan ScaleraDepartment of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Ave, FGH Building, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Stephan W AndersonDepartment of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Ave, FGH Building, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop machine learning (ML) models capable of predicting ICU admission and extended length of stay (LOS) after torso (chest, abdomen, or pelvis) trauma, by using clinical and/or imaging data. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a retrospective study of 840 adult patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center after injury to the torso over the course of 1 year. Clinical parameters included age, sex, vital signs, clinical scores, and laboratory values. Imaging data consisted of any injury present on CT. The two outcomes of interest were ICU admission and extended LOS, defined as more than the median LOS in the dataset. We developed and tested artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) models, and predictive performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).

resultsThe AUCs of SVM and ANN models to predict ICU admission were up to 0.87 ± 0.03 and 0.78 ± 0.02, respectively. The AUCs of SVM and ANN models to predict extended LOS were up to 0.80 ± 0.04 and 0.81 ± 0.05, respectively. Predictions based on imaging alone or imaging with clinical parameters were consistently more accurate than those based solely on clinical parameters.

conclusionsThe best performing models incorporated imaging findings and outperformed those with clinical findings alone. ML models have the potential to help predict outcomes in trauma by integrating clinical and imaging findings, although further research may be needed to optimize their performance. KEY POINTS: • Artificial neural network and support vector machine-based models were used to predict the intensive care unit admission and extended length of stay after trauma to the torso. • Our input data consisted of clinical parameters and CT imaging findings derived from radiology reports, and we found that combining the two significantly enhanced the prediction of both outcomes with either model. • The highest accuracy (83%) and highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.87) were obtained for artificial neural networks and support vector machines, respectively, by combining clinical and imaging features in the prediction of intensive care unit admission.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMachine LearningAdultHumansLength of StayRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTorsoAccidental injuries, diagnostic imagingArtificial intelligenceLength of stayMachine learningMultidetector computed tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.