ArticlePediatric surgery international2021
A review of adopted colorectal patients: a parent's perspective.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAfter treating many adopted patients with congenital colorectal conditions, our goal was to understand if parents were properly counseled about their child's medical needs before adoption.
methodsA comprehensive questionnaire was developed. Recruitment occurred by social media and colorectal database.
results48 parents participated. Adopted children were primarily male (60%), internationally adopted (75%), and a median age of 2.5 years (range newborn-13yo). While 96% of parents received medical records, 41% had incorrect/missing information. Most patients had an anorectal malformation (83%, Table 1), and a third had the primary pull-through prior to adoption (16). Nearly all required a surgical procedure after adoption (87%), including a redo pull-through (19%). Children were frequently incontinent of stool (83%) and urine (46%). In some families, the medical condition negatively affected the relationship between the parent and adopted child (12.5%), parent and other siblings (40.5%), and adopted child and other siblings (19%). 58% of parents state managing their child's medical condition was more difficult than anticipated. Family, friends, and the medical team was noted as the most helpful support systems. Table 1 Colorectal diagnoses Diagnosis Number of Participants Percentage (%) ARM (Unknown) 11 23 Cloaca 8 17 Cloacal Exstrophy 4 8 ARM No Fistula 3 6 Rectobulbar Fistula 3 6 Rectovestibular Fistula 3 6 Hirschsprung's Disease 3 6 Rectoprostatic Fistula 2 4 Spina Bifida 2 4 Rectoperineal Fistula 1 2 Rectovaginal Fistula 1 2 Rectobladderneck Fistula 1 2 Complex Malformation 1 2 Rectal Atresia 1 2 Rectal Stenosis 1 2 Idiopathic Constipation 1 2 Sacral Agenesis 1 2 Sacrococcygeal Teratoma 1 2
conclusionWe strongly recommend putting support systems in place, obtaining as much medical information as possible, preparing for possible lifelong management, and consulting with a specialized colorectal team before adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.