ArticleHeart and vessels2021
Influence of preoperative right ventricular function on left ventricular remodeling and survival after subvalvular repair for functional mitral regurgitation.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The association of right ventricular function with outcomes after cardiac surgery: a systematic review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Pooled it
- Right bundle branch block and risk of cardiovascular mortality: the Ibaraki Prefectural Health Study.Heart and vessels · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this study was to analyze our surgical experiences with mitral valve plasty (MVP) combined with subvalvular procedures (SVPs) for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and to determine which preoperative factors affected clinical outcomes.
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 33 patients who underwent MVP combined with SVPs for FMR with a left ventricular ejection fraction lower than 40% and advanced remodeled left ventricles. The mean follow-up period was 49 ± 33 months.
resultsThe preoperative mean right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC) used to quantify right ventricular (RV) systolic function was 26 ± 11%. Sixteen patients (48%) had an RVFAC < 26%. One patient died during hospital stay, and nine more patients died of cardiac causes during follow-up. The 3- and 5-year rates of freedom from cardiac-related mortality were 78% and 68%, respectively. RVFAC was the significant predictor of cardiac-related mortality in a univariate analysis (risk ratio [RR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.99, p = 0.03) and demonstrated a non-significant tendency to predict cardiac-related mortality in the Cox multivariate analysis (RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.86-1.003, p = 0.08). Continued reverse left ventricular remodeling was associated with an RVFAC ≥ 26%. At 3 years, there was also a significant difference in survival rates of cardiac-related mortality between patients with an RVFAC ≥ 26% and < 26% (94% vs. 61%; p = 0.03).
conclusionsPreoperative RV function affected left ventricular remodeling and cardiac-related mortality after MV surgery. MVP combined with SVPs for FMR provided promising results for patients without severe RV dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.