Trial reportBlood2021
Double unrelated umbilical cord blood vs HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation: the BMT CTN 1101 trial.
Trial report in Blood, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01597778 (A Multi-Center, Phase III, Randomized Trial of RIC and Transplantation of), which is not on this map. Cited by 117 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-Center, Phase III, Randomized Trial of RIC and Transplantation of (dUCB) Versus HLA-Haplo Related Bone Marrow for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies.(BMT CTN #1101)
Who cites it
117 citing papers in PubMed, 205 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phase II Study of Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis After HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donor Reduced Intensity Transplantation: Results From the ACCESS Trial Expansion Cohort.American journal of hematology · 2026Trial
- Donor-specific transplant outcomes from BMT CTN 1702: a multicenter prospective biologic assignment trial.Blood advances · 2026Trial
- Access to Allogeneic Cell Transplantation Based on Donor Search Prognosis: BMT CTN 1702 Trial.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Trial
- Upfront memory T cell add-back with haploidentical TCRαβ-depleted graft in adults with haematological malignancies: a nationwide, multicentre, single-arm, prospective study.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Trial
- Outcomes of myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with omidubicel vs alternative donor sources.Blood neoplasia · 2025Trial
- Intermediate-dose posttransplantation cyclophosphamide for myeloablative HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation.Blood advances · 2025Trial
- Early cessation of calcineurin inhibitors is feasible post-haploidentical blood stem cell transplant: the ANZHIT 1 study.Blood advances · 2023Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Unrelated Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation versus HLA-Haploidentical Related Bone Marrow Transplantation: Evidence from BMT CTN 1101.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2023Trial
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Double Umbilical Cord Blood versus Haploidentical Marrow Transplantation: A Quality of Life Analysis Report of BMT CTN 1101.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2023Trial
- Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis.The New England journal of medicine · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Impact of Center Experience with Donor Type on Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis, Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1101Open for Accrual June 2012Open for Accrual June 2012.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2022Trial
- Umbilical Cord Blood or HLA-Haploidentical Transplantation: Real-World Outcomes versus Randomized Trial Outcomes.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Engraftment of Double Cord Blood Transplantation after Nonmyeloablative Conditioning with Escalated Total Body Irradiation Dosing to Facilitate Engraftment in Immunocompetent Patients.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2021Trial
- Chronic graft-versus-host disease after PTCy-based prophylaxis vs non-PTCy prophylaxis.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Risk factors and longitudinal pulmonary function trajectories in a multicenter cohort.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Impact of infectious disease outbreaks and regulatory policies on cord blood banking: a two-decade single-center analysis in Korea.Stem cells translational medicine · 2026Article
- Donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in the posttransplant cyclophosphamide era.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Don't Cut the Cord: Why Umbilical Cord Blood Still Deserves a Place in Transplantation.International journal of immunogenetics · 2026Review
57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Results of 2 parallel phase 2 trials of transplantation of unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) or bone marrow (BM) from HLA-haploidentical relatives provided equipoise for direct comparison of these donor sources. Between June 2012 and June 2018, 368 patients aged 18 to 70 years with chemotherapy-sensitive lymphoma or acute leukemia in remission were randomly assigned to undergo UCB (n = 186) or haploidentical (n = 182) transplant. Reduced-intensity conditioning comprised total-body irradiation with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for both donor types. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for UCB transplantation was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and for haploidentical transplantation, posttransplant cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and MMF. The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment groups had similar age, sex, self-reported ethnic origin, performance status, disease, and disease status at randomization. Two-year PFS was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28% to 42%) compared with 41% (95% CI, 34% to 48%) after UCB and haploidentical transplants, respectively (P = .41). Prespecified analysis of secondary end points recorded higher 2-year nonrelapse mortality after UCB, 18% (95% CI, 13% to 24%), compared with haploidentical transplantation, 11% (95% CI, 6% to 16%), P = .04. This led to lower 2-year overall survival (OS) after UCB compared with haploidentical transplantation, 46% (95% CI, 38-53) and 57% (95% CI 49% to 64%), respectively (P = .04). The trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the primary end point, 2-year PFS, between the donor sources. Although both donor sources extend access to reduced-intensity transplantation, analyses of secondary end points, including OS, favor haploidentical BM donors. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01597778.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.