ArticleNeurosurgery2021
Prognostic Factors Associated With Surviving Less Than 3 Months vs Greater Than 3 Years Specific to Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Late Adverse Events.
Article in Neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- The transformative role of SBRT in the management of spinal metastases.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases with paraspinal extension.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases With Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Grades 1-2.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Stereotactic radiosurgery for lung cancer spinal metastases.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic factors for local failure and overall survival in patients with epidural disease at the cauda equina following stereotactic body radiotherapy: a clinical, anatomic and dosimetric analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Advanced Radiotherapy Technologies in Spine Tumors: What the Surgeon Needs to Know.Global spine journal · 2025Article
- Stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with bone metastases: a selected group with low rate of radiation treatment during the last month of life?Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Phase II Clinical Trial of Second Course of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases.Cancers · 2024Article
- Radiation-induced lumbosacral plexopathy and pelvic insufficiency fracture: A case report of unique coexistence of complications after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2024Article
- Practice and principles of stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Article
- MRI feature-based radiomics models to predict treatment outcome after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases: a review of 24 Gy in 2 daily fractions.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Review
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal oligometastases: a review on patient selection and the optimal methodology.Japanese journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Stereotactic radiotherapy for bone oligometastases.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022Review
- Planning for the Effect of the SC.24 Trial on Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Utilization at a Tertiary Cancer Center.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient selection is critical for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) given potential for serious adverse effects and the associated costs.
objectiveTo identify prognostic factors associated with dying within 3 mo, or living greater than 3 yr, following spine SBRT, to better inform patient selection.
methodsPatients living ≤3 mo after spine SBRT and >3 yr after spine SBRT were identified, and multivariable regression analyses were performed. We report serious late toxicities observed, including vertebral compression fractures (VCF) and plexopathy.
resultsA total of 605 patients (1406 spine segments) were treated from 2009 to 2018. A total of 51 patients (8.4%) lived ≤3 mo, and 79 patients (13%) survived >3 yr. Significant differences in baseline features were observed. On multivariable analysis, nonbreast/prostate primaries (odds ratio [ORs]: 28.8-104.2, P = .0004), eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) ≥2 (OR: 23.7, 95% CI: 3.2-177, P = .0020), polymetastatic disease (OR: 6.715, 95% CI: 1.89-23.85, P = .0032), painful lesions (OR: 3.833-8.898, P = .0118), and paraspinal disease (OR: 2.874, 95% CI: 1.118-7.393, P = .0288) were prognostic for ≤3 mo survival. The 3- and 5-yr rates of VCF were 10.4% and 14.4%, respectively, and 3- and 5-yr rates of plexopathy were 2.2% and 5.1%, respectively. A single duodenal perforation was observed, and there was no radiation myelopathy events.
conclusionShorter survival after spine SBRT was seen in patients with less radiosensitive histologies (ie, not breast or prostate), ECOG ≥2, and polymetastatic disease. Pain and paraspinal disease were also associated with poor survival. Fractionated spine SBRT confers a low risk of late serious adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.