Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33475718›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2021

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Perioptic Meningiomas: An International, Multicenter Study.

Adomas Bunevicius, Rithika Kormath Anand, Mohanad Suleiman, Ahmed M Nabeel, Wael A Reda, Sameh R Tawadros, Khaled Abdelkarim, Amr M N El-Shehaby, Reem M Emad, Tomas Chytka and 23 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Adomas BuneviciusDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Rithika Kormath AnandDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Mohanad SuleimanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Ahmed M NabeelGamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Wael A RedaGamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Sameh R TawadrosGamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Khaled AbdelkarimGamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Amr M N El-ShehabyGamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Reem M EmadGamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Tomas ChytkaStereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Roman LiscakStereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Kimball SheehanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Darrah SheehanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Marco Perez CaceresDepartment of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
David MathieuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Cheng-Chia LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Huai-Che YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Piero PicozziDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Andrea FranziniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Luca AttuatiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Herwin SpeckterCentro Gamma Knife Dominicano and CEDIMAT Radiology Department, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Jeremy OlivoCentro Gamma Knife Dominicano and CEDIMAT Radiology Department, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Samir PatelDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Christopher P CifarelliDepartment of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Daniel T CifarelliDepartment of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Joshua D HackDepartment of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Ben A StricklandDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Gabriel ZadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Eric L ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Kareem R FakhouryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Chad G RusthovenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Ronald E WarnickGamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Jason SheehanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used for management of perioptic meningiomas.

objectiveTo study the safety and effectiveness of SRS for perioptic meningiomas.

methodsFrom 12 institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF), we retrospectively assessed treatment parameters and outcomes following SRS for meningiomas located within 3 mm of the optic apparatus.

resultsA total of 438 patients (median age 51 yr) underwent SRS for histologically confirmed (29%) or radiologically suspected (71%) perioptic meningiomas. Median treatment volume was 8.01 cm3. Median prescription dose was 12 Gy, and median dose to the optic apparatus was 8.50 Gy. A total of 405 patients (93%) underwent single-fraction SRS and 33 patients (7%) underwent hypofractionated SRS. During median imaging follow-up of 55.6 mo (range: 3.15-239 mo), 33 (8%) patients experienced tumor progression. Actuarial 5-yr and 10-yr progression-free survival was 96% and 89%, respectively. Prescription dose of ≥12 Gy (HR: 0.310; 95% CI [0.141-0.679], P = .003) and single-fraction SRS (HR: 0.078; 95% CI [0.016-0.395], P = .002) were associated with improved tumor control. A total of 31 (10%) patients experienced visual decline, with actuarial 5-yr and 10-yr post-SRS visual decline rates of 9% and 21%, respectively. Maximum dose to the optic apparatus ≥10 Gy (HR = 2.370; 95% CI [1.086-5.172], P = .03) and tumor progression (HR = 4.340; 95% CI [2.070-9.097], P < .001) were independent predictors of post-SRS visual decline.

conclusionSRS provides durable tumor control and quite acceptable rates of vision preservation in perioptic meningiomas. Margin dose of ≥12 Gy is associated with improved tumor control, while a dose to the optic apparatus of ≥10 Gy and tumor progression are associated with post-SRS visual decline.

Indexed as

InternationalityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedOptic NerveProgression-Free SurvivalRadiosurgeryGamma KnifeOutcomesPerioptic meningiomaProgression-free survivalStereotactic radiosurgeryVisual outcomes

Identifiers

PMID33475718
PMCPMC8517876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.