Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33475516›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Impact of Teleconsultation on Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in the Brazilian Public Health System: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (TELEconsulta Diabetes Trial).

Daniela Laranja Gomes Rodrigues, Gisele Silvestre Belber, Frederica Valle De Queiroz Padilha, Ligia Fonseca Spinel, Frederico Rafael Moreira, Marcos Aurélio Maeyama, Ana Paula Neves Marques Pinho, Álvaro Avezum Júnior

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela Laranja Gomes Rodrigues *Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2976-6782
Gisele Silvestre Belber *Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2822-4666
Frederica Valle De Queiroz PadilhaHospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2668-9873
Ligia Fonseca SpinelSocial Responsability Centre, Hospital Alemáo Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8569-3296
Frederico Rafael MoreiraInnovation, Research and Education Institute, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5747-001X
Marcos Aurélio MaeyamaTelehealth Center, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4992-3810
Ana Paula Neves Marques PinhoSocial Responsability Centre, Hospital Alemáo Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0924-2378
Álvaro Avezum JúniorInnovation, Research and Education Institute, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2002-6270
Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) offers universal health coverage, access to quality care is often limited by social inequality and location. Although telemedicine has been shown to be an important tool in the efforts to overcome this problem, because it can provide access to specialist care and break the geographical barriers to health care, there are no national studies demonstrating its use in public health.

objectiveThis study aims to test the hypothesis that remote consultation can be as effective as standard face-to-face consultation for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Brazilian public health system and to assess the associated costs related to teleconsultation in public health scenarios, for patients referred from Primary Health Care units of the SUS for specialist care.

methodsThis is a pragmatic, phase 2, unicentric, open-label, noninferiority, blinded allocation, data-blinded, centrally randomized clinical trial. The inclusion criteria will be adults, both sexes, ≥18 years old, glycated hemoglobin (HbA

resultsThe results from this trial will be reported according to the CONSORT guidelines. The trial was approved by the institutional review board on October 5, 2019. Data collection started in January 2019 and is expected to finish in 2022. At the time of manuscript submission, 18 participants were recruited.

conclusionsOur expectations are that providing remote access to health care will result in improvements in the health and quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes and reduce costs and that both patients and clinicians will benefit from and be satisfied with this technology.

trial registrationRegistro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos RBR-8gpgyd; https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-8gpgyd. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/23679.

Indexed as

costsdiabetes mellituspublic healthremote consultationtelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33475516
PMCPMC7861994
OpenAlexW3094380799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.