Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33475471›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2021

Study design: policy landscape analysis for sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in seven sub-Saharan African countries.

Anne-Marie Thow, Agnes Erzse, Gershim Asiki, Charles Mulindabigwi Ruhara, Gemma Ahaibwe, Twalib Ngoma, Hans Justus Amukugo, Milka N Wanjohi, Mulenga M Mukanu, Lebogang Gaogane and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anne-Marie ThowMenzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6460-5864
Agnes ErzseSAMRC Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science - Priority Cost Effective Lessons for Systems Strengthening (PRICELESS SA), University of the Witwatersrand, School of Public Health , Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9303-9323
Gershim AsikiSchool of Economics, University of Rwanda , Butare, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-9966-1153
Charles Mulindabigwi RuharaSchool of Economics, University of Rwanda , Butare, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-0946-8318
Gemma AhaibweEconomic Policy Research Centre (EPRC), Makerere University , Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-2153-2028
Twalib NgomaOncology Department, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences , Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Hans Justus AmukugoCommunity Health Department, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Namibia , Windhoek, Namibia.ORCID 0000-0003-0512-4144
Milka N WanjohiHealth and Systems for Health Unit, African Population and Health Research Center , Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-4289-4762
Mulenga M MukanuHealth Policy and Management Unit, University of Zambia School of Public Health , Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0002-1207-0925
Lebogang GaoganeDepartment of Health Promotion & Education, Boitekanelo College , Gaborone, Botswana.
Safura Abdool KarimSAMRC Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science - Priority Cost Effective Lessons for Systems Strengthening (PRICELESS SA), University of the Witwatersrand, School of Public Health , Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4843-9907
Karen HofmanSAMRC Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science - Priority Cost Effective Lessons for Systems Strengthening (PRICELESS SA), University of the Witwatersrand, School of Public Health , Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9512-7220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reports on the design of a study to examine the policy landscape relevant to sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in seven sub-Saharan African countries. The study responds to the need for strong policy to address the rising burden of non-communicable diseases in the region. Sugar-sweetened beverage taxation has been widely recommended as a key component of a comprehensive policy approach to NCD prevention. However, it has proved a contentious policy intervention, with industry strongly opposing the introduction of such taxes. The aim was to identify opportunities to strengthen sugar-sweetened beverage taxation-related policy for the prevention of nutrition-related NCDs in a subset of Eastern and Southern African countries: Kenya, Tanzania, Botswana, Rwanda, Namibia, Zambia, Uganda. The study was conducted as a collaboration by researchers from nine institutions; including the seven study countries, South Africa, and Australia. The research protocol was collaboratively developed, drawing on theories of the policy process to examine the existing availability of evidence, policy context, and stakeholder interests and influence. This paper describes the development of a method for a policy landscape analysis to strengthen policies relevant to NCD prevention, and specifically sugar-sweetened beverage taxation. This takes the form of a prospective policy analysis, based on systematic documentary analysis supplemented by consultations with policy actors, that is feasible in low-resource settings. Data were collected from policy documents, government and industry reports, survey documentation, webpages, and academic literature. Consultations were conducted to verify the completeness of the policy-relevant data collection. We analysed the frames and beliefs regarding the policy 'problems', the existing policy context and understandings of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation as a potential policy intervention, and the political context across relevant sectors, including industry interests and influence in the policy process. This study design will provide insights to inform public health action to support sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in the region.

Indexed as

Sugar-Sweetened BeveragesAustraliaBotswanaHumansKenyaNamibiaPolicyPolicy MakingProspective StudiesRwandaSouth AfricaTanzaniaTaxesUgandaZambiaNoncommunicable diseasepolicypolitical economysugar-sweetened beveragetax

Identifiers

PMID33475471
PMCPMC7833028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.