Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33475448›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2021

Attention Biases Competition for Visual Representation via Dissociable Influences from Frontal and Parietal Cortex.

Andrew D Sheldon, Elyana Saad, Muhammet I Sahan, Emma E Meyering, Michael J Starrett, Joshua J LaRocque, Nathan S Rose, Bradley R Postle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew D SheldonUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
Elyana SaadHarvard Medical School.
Muhammet I SahanGhent University.
Emma E MeyeringUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
Michael J StarrettUniversity of California, Davis.
Joshua J LaRocqueNew York University.
Nathan S RoseUniversity of Notre Dame.
Bradley R PostleUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.

Funding

INTEGRATED TRAINING FOR PHYSICIAN-SCIENTISTST32GM008692 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURKARD, MARK E · 1998 to 2020
$10.3M
Investigating Cognitive &Neural Bases of Working MemoryR01MH064498 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI POSTLE, BRADLEY R · 2003 to 2020
$6.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008692NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What mechanisms underlie the prioritization of neural representations of visually perceived information to guide behavior? We assessed the dynamics whereby attention biases competition for representation of visual stimuli by enhancing representations of relevant information and suppressing the irrelevant. Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) classifiers were trained to discriminate patterns of fMRI activity associated with each of three stimuli, within several predefined ROIs. Participants performed a change-detection task wherein two of three presented items flashed at 1 Hz, one to each side of central fixation. Both flashing stimuli would unpredictably change state, but participants covertly counted the number of changes only for the cued item. In the ventral occipito-temporal ROI, MVPA evidence (a proxy for representational fidelity) was dynamically enhanced for attended stimuli and suppressed for unattended stimuli, consistent with a mechanism of biased competition between stimulus representations. Frontal and parietal ROIs displayed a qualitatively distinct, more "source-like" profile, wherein MVPA evidence for only the attended stimulus could be observed above baseline levels. To assess how attentional modulation of ventral occipito-temporal representations might relate to signals originating in the frontal and/or parietal ROIs, we analyzed informational connectivity (IC), which indexes time-varying covariation between regional levels of MVPA evidence. Parietal-posterior IC was elevated during the task, but did not differ for cued versus uncued items. Frontal-posterior IC, in contrast, was sensitive to an item's priority status. Thus, although regions of frontal and parietal cortex act as sources of top-down attentional control, their precise functions likely differ.

Indexed as

AttentionParietal LobeBiasBrain MappingCuesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhotic StimulationVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID33475448
PMCPMC8354683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.