Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33475420›Full record

ArticlePsychological methods2022

Dyadic analysis and the reciprocal one-with-many model: Extending the study of interpersonal processes with intensive longitudinal data.

Miriam Brinberg, Nilam Ram, David E Conroy, Aaron L Pincus, Denis Gerstorf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanisms of Change in Exposure Therapy for Anxiety and Related Disorders: A Research Agenda.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  2. Conceptualizing and Examining Change in Communication Research.Communication methods and measures · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miriam BrinbergDepartment of Communication Arts and Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0001-5202-9292
Nilam RamDepartments of Communication and Psychology, Stanford University.ORCID 0000-0003-1671-5257
David E ConroyDepartment of Kinesiology and Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0003-0204-4093
Aaron L PincusDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0002-6308-0250
Denis GerstorfDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
Population Research InstituteR24HD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI MATTHEWS, STEPHEN A · 2001 to 2016
$9.7M
The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Brian Thiede · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Toward a Unifying Model of Self-Regulation and its DevelopmentR01HD076994 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI COLE, PAMELA M, RAM, NILAM · 2014 to 2019
$2.8M
Penn State Biomedical Big Data to Knowledge (B2D2K) Training ProgramT32LM012415 · NLM · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI BROACH, JAMES R., HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2016 to 2020
$1.2M
ARRA: Tools for Articulating Within-Person Dynamic Models of Interpersonal InteraRC1AG035645 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI RAM, NILAM · 2009 to 2010
$998k
National Institute of HealthNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NIA NIH HHS RC1 AG035645NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076994NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041025NLM NIH HHS T32 LM012415Penn State Social Science Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newly available data streams from experience sampling studies and social media are providing new opportunities to study individuals' dyadic relations. The "one-with-many" (OWM) model (Kenny et al., 2006; Kenny & Winquist, 2001) was specifically constructed for and is used to examine features of multiple dyadic relationships that one set of focal persons (e.g., therapists, physicians) has with others (e.g., multiple clients, multiple patients). Originally, the OWM model was constructed for and applied to cross-sectional data. However, the model can be extended to accommodate and may be particularly useful for the analysis of intensive repeated measures data now being obtained through experience sampling and social media. This article (a) provides a practical tutorial on fitting the OWM model, (b) describes how the OWM model is extended for analysis of repeated measures data, and (c) illustrates application of the OWM model using reports about interpersonal behavior and benefits individuals experienced in 64,111 social interactions during 9 weeks of study (

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentInterpersonal RelationsCross-Sectional StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID33475420
PMCPMC8324320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.