ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2021
Spatial specificity of feature-based interaction between working memory and visual processing.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial reorganization of object representations in high-level visual cortex distinguishes working memory from perception.Science advances · 2026Article
- Bias in Visual Short-Term Memory for Motion Induced by Perceptually Suppressed Distractors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Temporal Dynamics and Representational Consequences of the Control of Processing Conflict between Visual Working Memory and Visual Perception.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
- Flexible top-down control in the interaction between working memory and perception.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Understanding occipital and parietal contributions to visual working memory: Commentary on Xu (2020).Visual cognition · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual working memory interacts with ongoing visual processing in a stimulus-specific manner, potentially through a common neural substrate supporting visual perception and working memory maintenance. The spatial specificity of this effect, however, remains unknown. The current study tested whether features in working memory influence perception in a spatially specific or global fashion. Across four experiments, subjects performed perceptual discrimination tasks on orientation or on contrast while concurrently holding an orientation in working memory. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that memory content boosted the perceived contrast of the discrimination stimulus when the two matched in orientation, but only when the locations of the memorandum and the discriminandum also matched. In turn, feature-based influence on memory precision was also greater when locations matched. Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrated that the spatial specificity of this interaction was influenced by task demands. When encoding of location was discouraged in Experiment 3, memory interacted with perception in a global fashion, whereas when location was task-relevant in otherwise very similar Experiment 4, the feature-based enhancement was again modulated by location. These results suggest that context-binding demand is an important determinant of the spatial specificity of memory-perception interaction and highlight the flexible configurability of working memory representations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.