Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33475395›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2022

An evaluation of the effect of methylphenidate on working memory, time perception, and choice impulsivity in children with ADHD.

Mileini Campez, Joseph S Raiker, Kelcey Little, Amy R Altszuler, Brittany M Merrill, Fiona L Macphee, Elizabeth M Gnagy, Andrew R Greiner, Erica D Musser, Erika K Coles and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mileini CampezCenter for Children and Families, Florida International University.ORCID 0000-0002-6813-2240
Joseph S RaikerCenter for Children and Families, Florida International University.ORCID 0000-0001-5364-3825
Kelcey LittleMarcus Autism Center.
Amy R AltszulerCenter for Children and Families, Florida International University.
Brittany M MerrillCenter for Children and Families, Florida International University.ORCID 0000-0003-3844-8399
Fiona L MacpheeCenter for Children and Families, Florida International University.
Elizabeth M GnagyCenter for Children and Families, Florida International University.
Andrew R GreinerCenter for Children and Families, Florida International University.
Erica D MusserCenter for Children and Families, Florida International University.
Erika K ColesCenter for Children and Families, Florida International University.
William E PelhamCenter for Children and Families, Florida International University.ORCID 0000-0002-3195-4478
Florida Department of Children and Families · USMarcus (United States) · US

Funding

Examining Tolerance to CNS Stimulants in ADDR01MH099030 · NIMH · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI PELHAM, WILLIAM E, SWANSON, JAMES M · 2013 to 2017
$3.3M
A novel examination of the neurobiological deficits underlying increased reaction time variability in children with ADHD.R21MH112002 · NIMH · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI MATTFELD, AARON, RAIKER, JOSEPH S. · 2017 to 2018
$403k
Brain and Behavior Research FoundationChildren's TrustNational Science FoundationNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH099030NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH112002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) consistently exhibit a stronger preference for immediate rewards than for larger rewards available following a delay on tasks measuring choice impulsivity (CI). Despite this, however, there remains a dearth of studies examining the impact of stimulant treatment on CI as well as associated higher order (e.g., working memory [WM]) and perceptual (e.g., time perception) cognitive processes. The present study examines the effect of osmotic release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) on CI, WM and time perception processes as well as the relation among these processes before and after taking a regimen of OROS-MPH. Thirty-five children (aged 7-12 years) with a diagnosis of ADHD participating in a concurrent stimulant medication study were recruited to complete computerized assessments of CI, WM, and time perception. Children completed the assessments after administration of a placebo as well as their lowest effective dose of OROS-MPH following a 2-week titration period. The results from one-sample t-tests indicated that OROS-MPH improves both CI and WM in youth with ADHD but does not impact time perception. Further, results revealed no significant association among the various indices of cognitive performance while taking placebo or OROS-MPH. Overall, the findings suggest that while OROS-MPH improves both CI and WM in youth with ADHD, improvements in CI as a result of OROS-MPH are unlikely to be associated with the improvements in WM given the lack of association among the two. Future studies should consider alternate cognitive, emotional, and motivational mechanisms that may account for the impact of OROS-MPH on CI. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidateTime PerceptionAdolescentChildDelayed-Action PreparationsHumansImpulsive BehaviorMemory, Short-TermTreatment OutcomeCentral Nervous System StimulantsDelayed-Action PreparationsMethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID33475395
PMCPMC8406432
OpenAlexW3122966869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.