Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33475141›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2021

De novo genome assembly of two tomato ancestors, Solanum pimpinellifolium and Solanum  lycopersicum var. cerasiforme, by long-read sequencing.

Hitomi Takei, Kenta Shirasawa, Kosuke Kuwabara, Atsushi Toyoda, Yuma Matsuzawa, Shinji Iioka, Tohru Ariizumi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Vegetable biology and breeding in the genomics era.Science China. Life sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The genome ofHorticulture research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hitomi TakeiGraduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan.
Kenta ShirasawaDepartment of Frontier Research and Development, Kazusa DNA Research Institute, Kisarazu, Chiba 292-0818, Japan.
Kosuke KuwabaraGraduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan.
Atsushi ToyodaComparative Genomics Laboratory, Advanced Genomics Center, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan.
Yuma MatsuzawaTOKITA Seed Co. LTD, Otone, Saitama 349-1144, Japan.
Shinji IiokaTOKITA Seed Co. LTD, Otone, Saitama 349-1144, Japan.
Tohru AriizumiTsukuba Plant Innovation Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ancestral tomato species are known to possess genes that are valuable for improving traits in breeding. Here, we aimed to construct high-quality de novo genome assemblies of Solanum pimpinellifolium 'LA1670' and S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme 'LA1673', originating from Peru. The Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) long-read sequences with 110× and 104× coverages were assembled and polished to generate 244 and 202 contigs spanning 808.8 Mbp for 'LA1670' and 804.5 Mbp for 'LA1673', respectively. After chromosome-level scaffolding with reference guiding, 14 scaffold sequences corresponding to 12 tomato chromosomes and 2 unassigned sequences were constructed. High-quality genome assemblies were confirmed using the Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs and long terminal repeat assembly index. The protein-coding sequences were then predicted, and their transcriptomes were confirmed. The de novo assembled genomes of S. pimpinellifolium and S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme were predicted to have 71,945 and 75,230 protein-coding genes, including 29,629 and 29,185 non-redundant genes, respectively, as supported by the transcriptome analysis results. The chromosome-level genome assemblies coupled with transcriptome data sets of the two accessions would be valuable for gaining insights into tomato domestication and understanding genome-scale breeding.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantSequence Analysis, DNATranscriptomeGenes, PlantGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, RNASolanumSolanum lycopersicumgene annotationlong-read sequencingRNA-Seqwhole-genome comparisonwild tomato

Identifiers

PMID33475141
PMCPMC7934570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.