Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33474862›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma & immunology research2021

Piperacillin-Tazobactam Allergies: An Exception to Usual Penicillin Allergy.

Jane Cy Wong, Elaine Yl Au, Heather Hf Yeung, Chak Sing Lau, Philip Hei Li

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma & immunology research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Piperacillin-tazobactam tolerability in patients with a labeled penicillin allergy (PIPPEN).Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Occupational Anaphylaxis to Piperacillin-Tazobactam in a Nurse: A Case Report.Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reports
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jane Cy WongDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6719-6787
Elaine Yl AuDivision of Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2724-6425
Heather Hf YeungDivision of Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5577-5474
Chak Sing LauDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6698-8355
Philip Hei LiDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong. liphilip@hku.hk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9155-9162
Queen Mary Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe majority of penicillin allergy labels are false, and skin tests (ST) have high negative predictive value (NPV) of up to 90%. Piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) allergy has been suspected to be an exception to this, but existing literature is scarce. We investigate the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, testing outcomes and predictive value of ST in patients referred for suspected PT allergies.

methodsThe records of all patients referred for suspected PT allergy testing and prescription rates of PT in all Hong Kong public hospitals (2015-2019) were analyzed.

resultsThere was an increase in both PT prescriptions and number of newly reported PT allergies between 2015 and 2019. The majority (91.1%) of patients with suspected PT allergy had at least 1 underlying medical co-morbidity or immunosuppressant use leading to increased risk of infections. Thirty-six patients with suspected PT allergy completed ST. Two patients had positive ST, and 32/34 patients with negative ST underwent drug provocation testing (DPT). Nine of these patients were diagnosed with PT allergy based on positive DPT. Overall, 11/34 (32.4%) were diagnosed with PT allergy and the NPV of ST was 71.9%.

conclusionsThere is growing utilization of PT and corresponding cases of suspected allergies. The majority of suspected PT allergies had increased risk for recurrent infections. Unlike other penicillin allergy, there is a high rate of genuine PT allergy (up to 30%) and a poor NPV of ST (up to 70%). DPT remains the gold standard for accurate diagnosis, and all patients with a suspected allergy should undergo thorough allergy workup.

Indexed as

anti-bacterial agentsdiagnosisdrugepidemiologyHypersensitivitypenicillinsskin tests

Identifiers

PMID33474862
PMCPMC7840879
OpenAlexW3110495790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.