Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33474851›Full record

ArticleThe world journal of men's health2021

Male Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis from the National Cancer Database.

Elizabeth B Elimimian, Leah Elson, Hong Li, Hong Liang, Nadeem Bilani, Emily C Zabor, Abby Statler, Zeina Nahleh

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The world journal of men's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth B ElimimianDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA. dr.elizabeth.elimimian@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5168-5781
Leah ElsonDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9169-3321
Hong LiDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9118-1297
Hong LiangDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9148-8894
Nadeem BilaniDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7335-9319
Emily C ZaborDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1402-4498
Abby StatlerTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-1646
Zeina NahlehDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2489-1501
Cleveland Clinic Florida · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer (BC) in males accounts for <0.5% of all male cancer diagnoses and ~1% of all BCs in the United States. We sought to describe clinicopathologic characteristics among male and female BC patients and differences in overall survival (OS) through the National Cancer Database over 13 years (2004-2016). MATERIALS AND

methodsSecondary to the 1:99 ratio of male to female BC cases, we randomly selected female cases for equal comparison to males cases by diagnosis year. Chi-square and t-tests compared demographic and tumor characteristics. OS was examined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

resultsAmong the ~2.7 million BC patients, 9 per 1,000 BCs were in males, the rate remained similar over time. The mean (SD) age was 64.9±13.0 years for males and 60.7±13.6 years for females. Most of the male BC cases were white (non-Hispanic) (n=19,015 [80.2%]), clinical stage I (n=7,353 [32.1%]) or stage II disease (n=7,923 [34.6%]), and tumors were moderate or poorly differentiated (84.5%). Males exhibited more comorbidities, presented with a larger proportion of disease, and decreased OS (p<0.005) than females. Male OS was >10% lower at 5-years and nearly 20% lower at 10-years for males. More males had primary BC tumors under the nipple; the 10-year OS rate for this site was 48.8%.

conclusionsThis study reports clinicopathologic characteristics of a large cohort of male BC. Males present at older age, with a greater comorbidity index, at later stages of disease. Increased education regarding the continued risks of male breast cancer may be warranted.

Indexed as

Breast neoplasms, maleEpidemiologyNeoplasmsPatient-relative outcomes

Identifiers

PMID33474851
PMCPMC8255393
OpenAlexW3110979386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.