Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33474849›Full record

ArticleThe world journal of men's health2021

Gender Differences in Osteoporosis: A Single-Center Observational Study.

Massimo De Martinis, Maria Maddalena Sirufo, Matteo Polsinelli, Giuseppe Placidi, Daniela Di Silvestre, Lia Ginaldi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The world journal of men's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Latin American patients' perceptions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment: The IOF Patient Advisory Group in Latin America.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Skeletal risk factors for postoperative complications in older men undergoing spinal fusion surgery.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Massimo De MartinisDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4253-1312
Maria Maddalena SirufoDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1006-7121
Matteo PolsinelliA2VI-Lab, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4215-2630
Giuseppe PlacidiA2VI-Lab, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4790-4029
Daniela Di SilvestreDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4734-9763
Lia GinaldiDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1841-2807
University of Teramo · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOsteoporosis affects more than 200 million people worldwide: its prevalence increases with age and is actually growing due to the constant population aging. Women are at greater risk than men, but in recent years it has become increasingly evident that osteoporosis represents a significantly important problem also for men. However, osteoporosis in men is still poorly studied, underdiagnosed and inadequately treated. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted an observational study to identify any gender disparities in osteoporosis screening. For this purpose we observed people consecutively admitted at our Outpatient Service for the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis during the last 3 years. Patients underwent clinical and laboratory assessment and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Bone turnover serum markers have been evaluated and stratified according to gender.

resultsOut of 3,752 patients, 2,376 subjects who met the inclusion criteria were identified. As expected, the great majority (94.5%) of the screened subjects were women and only 5.4% were men. Women exhibited lower BMD compared to men (T-score values: -2.33±1.14

conclusionsHere we highlighted that men are under-screened for osteoporosis and exhibit secondary osteoporosis more frequently than women.

Indexed as

AgingBoneBone densityGenderMenOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID33474849
PMCPMC8443988
OpenAlexW3107800429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.