Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33474695›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2022

Quantifying microcalcification activity in the thoracic aorta.

Alexander J Fletcher, Maria Lembo, Jacek Kwiecinski, Maaz B J Syed, Jennifer Nash, Evangelos Tzolos, Rong Bing, Sebastien Cadet, Gillian MacNaught, Edwin J R van Beek and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04083118 (Non-invasive Detection of Bicuspid Aortic Valve-Related Thoracic Aortopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04083118 completednot on this map

Non-invasive Detection of Bicuspid Aortic Valve-Related Thoracic Aortopathy

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2019 to 2023Enrolled95ConditionsBicuspid Aortic Valve, Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm, Aortic DissectionArmsclinical evaluation, blood markers, pulse wave analysis, 18F sodium fluoride PET/CT and PET/MRI, Repeat 18F sodium fluoride PET/MRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Reproducibility ofCurrent cardiology reports · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. AorticJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Artificial intelligence-based quantification of cardiac 18F-sodium fluoride uptake.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  11. [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Thoracic AorticJACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2022
    Observational
  14. Quantifying sodium [EJNMMI research · 2022
    Article
  15. A vessel of progress: Aortic microcalcification activity for the quantification ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Alexander J FletcherBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. afletch4@ed.ac.uk.
Maria LemboBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jacek KwiecinskiDepartment of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Maaz B J SyedBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jennifer NashDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Evangelos TzolosBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Rong BingBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sebastien CadetDepartment of Imaging (Division of Nuclear Cardiology), Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Los Angeles, USA.
Gillian MacNaughtBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Edwin J R van BeekBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Alistair J MossBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Mhairi K DorisBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Niki L WalkerBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Damini DeyDepartment of Imaging (Division of Nuclear Cardiology), Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Los Angeles, USA.
Philip D AdamsonChristchurch Heart Institute, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
David E NewbyBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Piotr J SlomkaDepartment of Imaging (Division of Nuclear Cardiology), Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Los Angeles, USA.
Marc R DweckBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
British Heart Foundation · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USInstitute of Cardiology · PLQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBThe Queen's Medical Research Institute · GBUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

Integrated analysis of coronary anatomy and biology with 18F-fluoride PET and CT angiographyR01HL135557 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI SLOMKA, PIOTR J · 2017 to 2020
$3.0M
British Heart Foundation CH/09/002/26360British Heart Foundation FS/14/78/31020British Heart Foundation FS/17/51/33096British Heart Foundation FS/18/31/33676British Heart Foundation FS/19/15/34155British Heart Foundation FS/CRTF/20/24086British Heart Foundation PG/19/40/34422British Heart Foundation RG/16/10/32375Medical Research Council G0701127Medical Research Council MC_PC_12040NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135557Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard methods for quantifying positron emission tomography (PET) uptake in the aorta are time consuming and may not reflect overall vessel activity. We describe aortic microcalcification activity (AMA), a novel method for quantifying

methodsTwenty patients underwent two hybrid

resultsAortic microcalcification activity demonstrated excellent intra-observer (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.98) and inter-observer (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.97) repeatability with very good scan-rescan reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.86) which were similar to previously described TBRmean and TBRmax methods. AMA analysis was much quicker to perform than standard TBR assessment (3.4min versus 15.1min, P<0.0001). AMA was correlated with Framingham stroke risk scores and Framingham risk score for hard cononary heart disease.

conclusionsAMA is a simple, rapid and reproducible method of quantifying global

Indexed as

CalcinosisFluorine RadioisotopesAorta, ThoracicHumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyReproducibility of ResultsSodium FluorideFluorine RadioisotopesSodium FluorideImage analysisModalitiesMolecular imaging agentsOthersPETTechnicalTestsTracers

Identifiers

PMID33474695
PMCPMC8497049
OpenAlexW3122229839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.