ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 and lung ultrasound B lines as potential diagnostic and prognostic factors for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic methods of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic review.Rheumatology international · 2026Pooled it
- Detection of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
- ERS/EULAR clinical practice guidelines for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease.The European respiratory journal · 2026Guideline
- Biomarkers of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Patient-level factors predictive of interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.RMD open · 2023Pooled it
- Krebs von den lungen-6 as a clinical marker for hypersensitivity pneumonitis: A meta-analysis and bioinformatics analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- KL-6 as an Immunological Biomarker Predicts the Severity, Progression, Acute Exacerbation, and Poor Outcomes of Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Pooled it
- Tumor markers in rheumatoid arthritis -associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC rheumatology · 2026Article
- Lung ultrasound B-line quantification in CTD-ILD: a cross-sectional single-center observational study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Induced sputum KL-6 combined with HRCT scoring for diagnosing and monitoring idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Observational
- Predictive Biomarkers and Novel Treatments for the Progressive Fibrosing Phenotype in Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Connective Tissue Disease.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- A Proposal for a New Lung Ultrasound Score in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Reliability of Lung Ultrasound for Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease Diagnosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Serum Biomarkers of Pulmonary Damage and Risk for Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.The Journal of rheumatology · 2025Article
- Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease (RA-ILD): Update on Prevalence, Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, and Therapy.Current rheumatology reports · 2024Review
- A versatile role for lung ultrasound in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases related pulmonary involvement: a narrative review.Arthritis research & therapy · 2024Review
- Moving forward in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease Screening.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- A Systematic Review of the Key Predictors of Progression and Mortality of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Burden of Interstitial Lung Involvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Could Lung Ultrasound Have a Role in Its Detection? A Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Multidimensional biomarker approach integrating tumor markers, inflammatory indicators, and disease activity indicators may improve prediction of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- Clinically Relevant Biomarkers in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) (RA-ILD) is a serious systemic RA manifestation with high mortality that needs proper, accurate, and sensitive assessment tools.
objectivesFirstly, evaluate serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels and lung ultrasound B lines (LUS B lines) score in RA-ILD correlating them with the severity of ILD assessed by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Secondly, determine cut-off values for LUS and KL-6 in RA-ILD assessment and outcome prediction.
methodsA case-control study included seventy-five RA-ILD patients with an equal number of matched RA patients without ILD. Clinical assessment includes DAS-28 and PFTs, laboratory assessment of serum KL-6 by latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay, and radiological evaluation of ILD using semiquantitative CT grade and LUS B lines.
resultsRA-ILD patients had significantly higher serum KL6 compared to those without ILD (1025.5 ± 419.6 vs. 237.5 ± 51.9, p ≤ 0.001). Serum KL6 was positively correlated with HRCT and LUS scores (r = 0.93, r = 0.97, respectively) with negative correlation with FVC% and FEV1% (r = - 0.93, r = - 0.91, respectively). LUS was positively correlated with KL6 and HRCT (r = 0.97, r = 0.944, respectively) while, negatively correlated with PFTs. Cut-off values of KL6 and LUS were 277.5 U/ml and < 5.5, with AUC 0.878 and 1, sensitivity 86.7% and 100%, and specificity 88% and 100%, respectively.
conclusionsThe non-invasive, radiation-free LUS with a score < 5.5 combined with serum KL6 could be helpful for RA-ILD assessment correlating with HRCT and disease severity. Serum KL6 combined with LUS is important new and potential prognostic factor predicting poor outcomes in RA-ILD. Further large-scale, multi-center, and prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. KEY POINTS: • Combination of the non-invasive, radiation-free LUS with a score < 5.5 and serum KL6 levels of 277.5 U/ml is recommended as prognostic tools for RA-ILD. • Easily obtainable tests such as serum KL-6, inflammatory markers, and LUS are sensitive for assessing RA-ILD and the risk of poor outcomes in patients with RA-ILD. • RA-ILD patients with higher KL6 levels, higher LUS scores had a poor prognosis with short survival. • LUS B lines could be used as the first imaging tool for the evaluation of RA-ILD decreasing the risk of HRCT radiation exposure in asymptomatic or mild RA-ILD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.