ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
The impact of education and clinical decision support on the quality of positive antinuclear antibody referrals.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Reliability and reproducibility of antinuclear antibody testing in pediatric rheumatology practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To implement and evaluate an intervention using education and clinical decision support (CDS) to improve the quality of positive ANA referrals. We retrospectively reviewed "positive ANA" referrals from April 2017 to May 2019. Demographic data and referring provider's location were recorded. Final diagnoses were categorized into two groups: rheumatic disease (RD) or no RD. We compared pre- and post-intervention groups for each type of referral. The positive predictive value (PPV) of an ANA referral leading to an RD for each referral group was calculated. Our intervention consisted of an educational poster and CDS which included a hard-stop prompt embedded into the electronic ANA order. All internal subgroups received CDS; only the main campus primary care providers (IPCP) received the educational poster. The external (EXT) referral subgroup did not receive either intervention. We found a significant increase in the number of RDs diagnosed post-intervention (p = 0.007). The PPV for all referrals increased from 16% to 26% during this project. All groups demonstrated improvement in PPV except the EXT group, which showed no change. Subgroups which demonstrated significant increase in the diagnosis of RD included total internal (p = 0.0005), internal PCP (p = 0.002), and affiliated primary care providers (p = 0.0002). The IPCP subgroup additionally received the educational intervention and did not demonstrate significant improvement. Implementing an intervention with a CDS component helps improve the quality of positive ANA referrals to rheumatology. Key Points • Clinical decision support improves the quality of positive ANA referrals. • Incorporating clinical decision support within the ANA order of an EHR is an effective way to deliver information to impact ordering at the "point of care."
Indexed as
Identifiers
33474658What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.