ArticleAnnals of hematology2021
Both the subtypes of KIT mutation and minimal residual disease are associated with prognosis in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective clinical cohort study in single center.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical profiling of AML1::ETO and KIT exon 17 mutation in pediatric AML by high-throughput drug sensitivity.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Genetic alterations and measurable residual disease in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Co-Mutation of ASXL1 and KRAS Defines a Novel Ultra-Adverse-Risk Subtype of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in a Large-Scale Cohort.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and therapeutic determinants ofHaematologica · 2025Article
- Review
- Genetic abnormalities predict outcomes in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21) and KIT mutation treatment with avapritinib post-stem cell transplantation: a report of four cases.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Detection of Hybrid Fusion Transcripts, Aberrant Transcript Expression, and Specific Single Nucleotide Variants in Acute Leukemia and Myeloid Disorders with Recurrent Gene Rearrangements.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2024Article
- Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors analysis of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia in real world.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of efficacy between homoharringtonine, aclarubicin, cytarabine (HAA) and idarubicin, cytarabine (IA) regimens as induction therapy in patients with de novo core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2023Article
- [Short-term efficacy of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia: a single-institution experience].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022Article
- How to Improve Prognostication in Acute Myeloid Leukemia withBiomedicines · 2021Review
- Emerging therapies for inv(16) AML.Blood · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML), including cases with KIT mutation, is currently defined as a low-risk AML. However, some patients have poor response to treatment, and the prognostic significance of KIT mutation is still controversial. This study aimed to explore the prognostic significance of different KIT mutation subtypes and minimal residual disease (MRD) in CBF-AML. We retrospectively evaluated continuous patients diagnosed with CBF-AML in our center between January 2014 and April 2019. Of the 215 patients, 147 (68.4%) and 68 (31.6%) patients were RUNX1-RUNX1T1- and CBFB-MYH11 positive, respectively. KIT mutations were found in 71 (33.0%) patients; of them, 38 (53.5%) had D816/D820 mutations. After excluding 10 patients who died or were lost to follow-up within a half year, 42.0% (n = 86) of the remaining 205 patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). An MRD > 0.1% at the end of two cycles of consolidation predicted relapse (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that D816 or D820 mutations and MRD > 0.1% at the end of two cycles of consolidation were independent adverse factors affecting relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Allo-HSCT could improve RFS (74.4% vs. 34.6%, P < 0.001) and OS (78.1% vs. 52.3%, P = 0.002). In conclusion, high-risk CBF-AML patients must be identified before treatment. D816/D820 mutation, MRD > 0.1% at the end of two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy predicted poor survivals, and allo-HSCT can improve the survival of properly identified patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.