Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33474133›Full record

ArticleMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources2018

DNA barcoding as a tool for robust identification of cervids of India and its utility in wildlife forensics.

Ved P Kumar, Malay Shukla, Ankita Rajpoot, Mukesh Thakur, Parag Nigam, Dhyanendra Kumar, Anil Kumar Mehta, Surendra P Goyal

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A review of the genusSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ved P KumarWildlife Forensic Cell, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7007-9891
Malay ShuklaWildlife Forensic Cell, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7239-5537
Ankita RajpootMolecular Systematics Laboratory, Zoological Survey of India, Northern Regional Centre, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7642-3996
Mukesh ThakurMolecular Systematics Division,Centre for DNA Taxonomy, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India.
Parag NigamWildlife Forensic Cell, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Dhyanendra KumarDepartment of Zoology, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah, Bihar, India.
Anil Kumar MehtaInstitute of Forensic Science, Gujarat Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Surendra P GoyalDepartment of Zoology, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah, Bihar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA barcoding has become a popular method of choice for identification of specimen based on molecular techniques. Here, we present preliminary findings on generating robust DNA barcode library of Cervids of India. The dataset comprising the DNA barcode library of seven deer species included in the genus

Indexed as

cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI)DNA barcodingintraspecies and interspecieswildlife forensic and conservation biology

Identifiers

PMID33474133
PMCPMC7800678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.