ArticleJIMD reports2021
Pancreatitis in multiple acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: An underdiagnosed complication.
Article in JIMD reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- STARD10 regulates human pancreatic β cell differentiation and triglyceride metabolism.Stem cell reports · 2026Article
- Pancreatitis in multiple acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: An underdiagnosed complication.JIMD reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MADD) deficiency represents a rare fatty acid oxidation disorder where sporadic reports of pancreatitis already exist. Here, we report three cases of MADD with pancreatic involvement raising questions whether this represents an incidental finding or it is related to the pathophysiology of MADD.
methodsWe have retrospectively studied the clinical, biochemical and radiologic data of patients with MADD diagnosed in our department over the last 20 years to identify patients with pancreatic involvement.
resultsThree out of 17 patients had pancreatic involvement. All three patients were diagnosed with MADD in the neonatal period (two-third symptomatic-riboflavin nonresponsive, one-third asymptomatic via newborn screening-riboflavin responsive). Age at presentation of pancreatitis ranged from 20 months to 11 years. Presentations included a single episode of acute pancreatitis in the first patient, chronic necrotizing pancreatitis in the second patient, while the third patient was diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis (CP) incidentally through ultrasonography. All patients had inflammation features on either abdominal computed tomography or ultrasound. Pancreatic enzymes were elevated in two patients. Management of pancreatitis was done conservatively while the patient with necrotic CP required subtotal pancreatectomy. DISCUSSION: Our data suggest that pancreatitis might be more common in patients with MADD than previously reported, requiring a high index of suspicion in patients with acute metabolic decompensation or nonspecific abdominal symptoms. We hypothesize that the underlying mechanism of pancreatitis in MADD is similar to that in mitochondrial disorders, both resulting from disordered energy metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.