Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33473236›Full record

ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2021

Use of chlorhexidine chip after scaling and root planning on periodontal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cleber Davi Del Rei Daltro Rosa, Jéssica Marcela de Luna Gomes, Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos, Tatiana Prosini da Fonte, João Pedro Justino de Oliveira Limirio, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Treatment of periodontal disease: does drug delivery matter?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Evaluating the therapeutic potential ofJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cleber Davi Del Rei Daltro RosaDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dentistry School, UNESP - São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", R: José Bonifácio, 1193. Vila Mendonça, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Jéssica Marcela de Luna GomesDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dentistry School, UNESP - São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", R: José Bonifácio, 1193. Vila Mendonça, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Sandra Lúcia Dantas de MoraesDentistry School, UPE - University of Pernambuco, Camaragibe, Pernambuco, Av. General Newton Cavalcanti, 1650; Tabatinga, Camaragibe, PE, Brazil.
Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo LemosAdjunct Professor, Department of Dentistry (Division of Prosthodontics), Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Campus Avançado Governador Valadares, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Tatiana Prosini da FonteUniversity of São Paulo, Faculty of Dentistry of Bauru, Department of Prosthesis and Periodontics, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
João Pedro Justino de Oliveira LimirioDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dentistry School, UNESP - São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", R: José Bonifácio, 1193. Vila Mendonça, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Eduardo Piza PellizzerDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dentistry School, UNESP - São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", R: José Bonifácio, 1193. Vila Mendonça, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis systematic review aims to assess the efficacy chlorhexidine chip as an adjunctive therapy of scaling and root planning on periodontal disease treatment. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis study follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42019148221). The search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases until April 2020. The PICO question was: "Is the chlorhexidine chip (CHX) effective as an adjunctive therapy of scaling and root planning on periodontal disease treatment?". Inclusion criteria involved: randomized controlled clinical trials, with a minimum of 15 patients included on the sample and each patient has two sites of probing depth of ≥5 mm; The minimum follow up was at least 1 months of follow-up and the outcomes present in the studies probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI) and clinical attachment level (CAL) after scaling and root planning (SRP).

resultsAfter searching the databases, 13 articles were selected for qualitative and 8 for quantitative analysis. Were included 427 patients, with a mean age of 45.6 years. The results shown that the association of chlorhexidine chips to scaling and root planning reduce periodontal pocket depths (

conclusionsThus, we can conclude that chlorhexidine chip when used associated to scaling and root planning promoted a significant improvement the reduction of periodontal diseases.

Indexed as

Chlorhexidine gluconateDental scalingPeriodontal diseasesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33473236
PMCPMC7801239
OpenAlexW3104037764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.