Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33473166›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2021

Long-term risk of subsequent cancer incidence among hereditary and nonhereditary retinoblastoma survivors.

Sara J Schonfeld, Ruth A Kleinerman, David H Abramson, Johanna M Seddon, Margaret A Tucker, Lindsay M Morton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sara J SchonfeldDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. schonfes@mail.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4368-4647
Ruth A KleinermanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-2478
David H AbramsonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Johanna M SeddonUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Margaret A TuckerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0274-6773
Lindsay M MortonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Studies of Populations Exposed to Therapeutic Medical Radiation and Other AgentsZIACP010131 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI MORTON, LINDSAY · 2009 to 2025
$81.0M
Rare Genetic Variation in Macular DegenerationR01EY028602 · NEI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SEDDON, JOHANNA M · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased sarcoma and melanoma risks after hereditary retinoblastoma are well established, whereas less is known about epithelial subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs) and risks for multiple (≥2) SMNs.

methodsLeveraging long-term follow-up and detailed histologic information, we quantified incident SMN risk among 1128 hereditary and 924 nonhereditary retinoblastoma survivors (diagnosed 1914-2006; follow-up through 2016). Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) compared cancer risk after retinoblastoma relative to the general population. We estimated cumulative incidence accounting for competing risk of death.

resultsHereditary survivors had statistically significantly increased SMN risk (N = 239; SIR = 11.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.4-13.5), with SIRs >80-fold for sarcomas, nasal cavity tumours and pineoblastoma. Significantly increased risks were also observed for melanoma and central nervous system, oral cavity and breast SMNs (SIRs = 3.1-17), but not the uterus, kidney, lung, bladder, pancreas or other types. Cumulative incidence 50 years following hereditary retinoblastoma was 33.1% (95% CI 29.0-37.2) for a first SMN and 6.0% (95% CI 3.8-8.2) for a second SMN. SMN risk was not increased after nonhereditary retinoblastoma (N = 25; SIR = 0.8; 95% CI 0.5-1.2).

conclusionBeyond the established sarcoma and melanoma risks after hereditary retinoblastoma, we demonstrate increased risk for a more limited number of epithelial malignancies than previously suggested. Cumulative incidence estimates emphasise long-term SMN burden after hereditary retinoblastoma.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultCancer SurvivorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryPrognosisRetinal NeoplasmsRetinoblastomaSurvival RateUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33473166
PMCPMC8007574
OpenAlexW3121885921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.