Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33473113›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Scaling of sensory information in large neural populations shows signatures of information-limiting correlations.

MohammadMehdi Kafashan, Anna W Jaffe, Selmaan N Chettih, Ramon Nogueira, Iñigo Arandia-Romero, Christopher D Harvey, Rubén Moreno-Bote, Jan Drugowitsch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

MohammadMehdi KafashanDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Anna W JaffeDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2335-5598
Selmaan N ChettihDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Ramon NogueiraCenter for Theoretical Neuroscience, Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Iñigo Arandia-RomeroISAAC Lab, Aragón Institute of Engineering Research, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6020-9071
Christopher D HarveyDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Rubén Moreno-BoteCenter for Brain and Cognition and Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Jan DrugowitschDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. jan_drugowitsch@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7846-0408
Harvard University · USColumbia University · USUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

Toward mechanistic cognitive neuroscience: cell types, connectivity, and patterned perturbationsDP1MH125776 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARVEY, CHRISTOPHER D · 2020 to 2024
$5.9M
Studying perceptual decision-making across cortex by combining population imaging, connectomics, and computational modelingR01NS108410 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARVEY, CHRISTOPHER D, LEE, WEI-CHUNG ALLEN · 2018 to 2022
$5.7M
Parietal Cortex Networks for Sensorimotor Processing During NavigationR01NS089521 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARVEY, CHRISTOPHER D · 2015 to 2024
$4.5M
New approaches to understand neuronal microcircuit dynamics for working memoryR01MH107620 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARVEY, CHRISTOPHER D · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
CRCNS: Leveraging decision-making variability to identify underlying computations R01MH115554 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DRUGOWITSCH, JAN · 2017 to 2019
$559k
Optical interrogation of laminar microcircuit computations in mouse primary visual cortexF31EY031562 · NEI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI JAFFE, ANNA WANG · 2020 to 2022
$55k
Howard Hughes Medical Institute 55008742NEI NIH HHS F31 EY031562NIMH NIH HHS DP1 MH125776NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107620NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115554NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS089521NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS108410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How is information distributed across large neuronal populations within a given brain area? Information may be distributed roughly evenly across neuronal populations, so that total information scales linearly with the number of recorded neurons. Alternatively, the neural code might be highly redundant, meaning that total information saturates. Here we investigate how sensory information about the direction of a moving visual stimulus is distributed across hundreds of simultaneously recorded neurons in mouse primary visual cortex. We show that information scales sublinearly due to correlated noise in these populations. We compartmentalized noise correlations into information-limiting and nonlimiting components, then extrapolate to predict how information grows with even larger neural populations. We predict that tens of thousands of neurons encode 95% of the information about visual stimulus direction, much less than the number of neurons in primary visual cortex. These findings suggest that the brain uses a widely distributed, but nonetheless redundant code that supports recovering most sensory information from smaller subpopulations.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsBrainMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsNoisePhotic StimulationVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID33473113
PMCPMC7817840
OpenAlexW3121212723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.