Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33473043›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

EUS-guided transanastomotic drainage for severe biliopancreatic anastomotic stricture using a forward-viewing echoendoscope in patients with surgically altered anatomy.

Tomohisa Iwai, Mitsuhiro Kida, Hiroshi Yamauchi, Kosuke Okuwaki, Toru Kaneko, Rikiya Hasegawa, Masafumi Watanabe, Takahiro Kurosu, Hiroshi Imaizumi, Wasaburo Koizumi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tomohisa IwaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Mitsuhiro KidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroshi YamauchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kosuke OkuwakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Toru KanekoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Rikiya HasegawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masafumi WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takahiro KurosuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroshi ImaizumiDepartment of Gastroenterology, JCHO Sagamino Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Wasaburo KoizumiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kitasato University Hospital · JPNational Sagamihara Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesBalloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (BE-ERCP) has become the first-line therapy for biliopancreatic anastomotic strictures. However, it is not always successful, and salvage methods have not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of EUS-guided transanastomotic drainage using a forward-viewing (FV) echoendoscope. PATIENTS AND

methodsOf eight cases wherein BE-ERCP treatment failed due to severe or complete benign anastomotic stricture, seven cases underwent EUS-guided choledochojejunostomy, and EUS-guided pancreaticojejunostomy was applied in one case after intubating an FV echoendoscope into the anastomotic site.

resultsThe success rate of reaching the target site was 100% (8/8) for patients after modified Child resection. The median time to reach the anastomosis was 5 min (range: 3-17 min), and the technical success rate for drainage was 75% (6/8). The median total procedure time was 33.5 min (range: 22-45 min) for six successful cases. Cautery dilatation catheters were necessary to dilate the puncture site in all cases, and no early complications were observed. During the follow-up period (median: 13.3 months [range: 6.5-60.3]), recurrence of the stricture occurred in one case, and a stent-free status was achieved after 6-12 months of stent placement in five cases.

conclusionsEUS-guided transanastomotic drainage using an FV echoendoscope is a feasible and safe rescue technique for the management of benign severe biliopancreatic anastomotic strictures.

Indexed as

anastomotic stricturebenign strictureEUS-guided transanastomotic drainagesurgically altered anatomy

Identifiers

PMID33473043
PMCPMC7980695
OpenAlexW3121545946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.