Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33472848›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of sports medicine2021

Return to play with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: are we moving too fast? A critical review.

Jonathan A Drezner, Aneil Malhotra, Jordan M Prutkin, Michael Papadakis, Kimberly G Harmon, Irfan M Asif, David S Owens, Joseph C Marek, Sanjay Sharma

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Mechanisms and prognostic impact of myocardial ischaemia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Arrhythmogenesis of Sports: Myth or Reality?Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2022
    Review
  7. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Updates Through the Lens of Sports Cardiology.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jonathan A DreznerCenter for Sports Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA jdrezner@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-9120
Aneil MalhotraDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8670-3764
Jordan M PrutkinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Michael PapadakisCardiology, Clinical Academic Group, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Kimberly G HarmonCenter for Sports Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3670-6609
Irfan M AsifCenter for Health Promotion, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
David S OwensDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Joseph C MarekCardiology, Advocate Heart Institute, Downers Grove, Illinois, USA.
Sanjay SharmaCardiology, Clinical Academic Group, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
University of Washington · USSt George's, University of London · GBCenter for Nutrition Policy and Promotion · USInstitute of Cardiology · PLUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of a potentially lethal cardiovascular disease in a young athlete presents a complex dilemma regarding athlete safety, patient autonomy, team or institutional risk tolerance and medical decision-making. Consensus cardiology recommendations previously supported the 'blanket' disqualification of athletes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) from competitive sport. More recently, epidemiological studies examining the relative contribution of HCM as a cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young athletes and reports from small cohorts of older athletes with HCM that continue to exercise have fueled debate whether it is safe to play with HCM. Shared decision-making is endorsed within the sports cardiology community in which athletes can make an informed decision about treatment options and potentially elect to continue competitive sports participation. This review critically examines the available evidence relevant to sports eligibility decisions in young athletes diagnosed with HCM. Histopathologically, HCM presents an unstable myocardial substrate that is vulnerable to ventricular tachyarrhythmias during exercise. Studies support that young age and intense competitive sports are risk factors for SCD in patients with HCM. We provide an estimate of annual mortality based on our understanding of disease prevalence and the incidence of HCM-related SCD in different athlete populations. Adolescent and young adult male athletes and athletes participating in a higher risk sport such as basketball, soccer and American football exhibit a greater risk. This review explores the potential harms and benefits of sports disqualification in athletes with HCM and details the challenges and limitations of shared decision-making when all parties may not agree.

Indexed as

Cardiomyopathy, HypertrophicReturn to SportSportsAdolescentAthletesDeath, Sudden, CardiacDecision MakingHumansMaleYoung Adultcardiovasculardeathheart diseasepreventionsport

Identifiers

PMID33472848
PMCPMC8408577
OpenAlexW3122145071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.