Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33472838›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2021

Conference equity in global health: a systematic review of factors impacting LMIC representation at global health conferences.

Lotta Velin, Jean-Wilguens Lartigue, Samantha Ann Johnson, Anudari Zorigtbaatar, Ulrick Sidney Kanmounye, Paul Truche, Michelle Nyah Joseph

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Towards a more inclusive psychiatry: diversity among presenters and participants in the 25th World Congress of Psychiatry.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lotta VelinProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1929-6011
Jean-Wilguens LartigueProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9889-7976
Samantha Ann JohnsonMedicine, Life Sciences & Psychology Department, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4716-1229
Anudari ZorigtbaatarProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5050-8967
Ulrick Sidney KanmounyeProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Paul TrucheProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michelle Nyah JosephProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Michelle_Joseph@hms.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlobal health conferences are important platforms for knowledge exchange, decision-making and personal and professional growth for attendees. Neocolonial patterns in global health at large and recent opinion reports indicate that stakeholders from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) may be under-represented at such conferences. This study aims to describe the factors that impact LMIC representation at global health conferences.

methodsA systematic review of articles reporting factors determining global health conference attendance was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles presenting conference demographics and data on the barriers and/or facilitators to attendance were included. Articles were screened at title and abstract level by four independent reviewers. Eligible articles were read in full text, analysed and evaluated with a risk of bias assessment.

resultsAmong 8765 articles screened, 46 articles met inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis yielded two themes: 'barriers to conference attendance' and 'facilitators to conference attendance'. In total, 112 conferences with 254 601 attendees were described, of which 4% of the conferences were hosted in low-income countries. Of the 98 302 conference attendees, for whom affiliation was disclosed, 38 167 (39%) were from LMICs.

conclusion'Conference inequity' is common in global health, with LMIC attendees under-represented at global health conferences. LMIC attendance is limited by systemic barriers including high travel costs, visa restrictions and lower acceptance rates for research presentations. This may be mitigated by relocating conferences to visa-friendly countries, providing travel scholarships and developing mentorship programmes to enable LMIC researchers to participate in global conferences.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesGlobal HealthDelivery of Health CareHumansHealth policySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33472838
PMCPMC7818815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.