ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021
Highlights from the Era of Open Source Web-Based Tools.
Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Proofreading of Digitally Reconstructed Neural Morphology Enhances Accuracy, Scalability, and Standardization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Pennsieve: A Collaborative Platform for Translational Neuroscience and Beyond.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Genetic modulation of protein expression in rat brain.iScience · 2025Article
- Innovations in noninvasive sensory stimulation treatments to combat Alzheimer's disease.PLoS biology · 2025Review
- A localized tracing technique to explore intra-amygdala functional and structural correlates of individual variability in behavioral response.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025Article
- Accelerating the continuous community sharing of digital neuromorphology data.FASEB bioAdvances · 2024Article
- Automatic identification of scientific publications describing digital reconstructions of neural morphology.Brain informatics · 2023Article
- A guide to the BRAIN Initiative Cell Census Network data ecosystem.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Automatic identification of scientific publications describing digital reconstructions of neural morphology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Cell morphologies in the nervous system: Glia steal the limelight.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2023Article
- Assisted neuroscience knowledge extraction via machine learning applied to neural reconstruction metadata on NeuroMorpho.Org.Brain informatics · 2022Article
- Large scale similarity search across digital reconstructions of neural morphology.Neuroscience research · 2022Article
- A Systematic, Open-Science Framework for Quantification of Cell-Types in Mouse Brain Sections Using Fluorescence Microscopy.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High digital connectivity and a focus on reproducibility are contributing to an open science revolution in neuroscience. Repositories and platforms have emerged across the whole spectrum of subdisciplines, paving the way for a paradigm shift in the way we share, analyze, and reuse vast amounts of data collected across many laboratories. Here, we describe how open access web-based tools are changing the landscape and culture of neuroscience, highlighting six free resources that span subdisciplines from behavior to whole-brain mapping, circuits, neurons, and gene variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.