ArticleBMJ open2021
Frontline healthcare workers' experiences with personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid qualitative appraisal.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
144 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Training and redeployment of healthcare workers to intensive care units (ICUs) during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- The Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Front Line Nurses: A Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Design considerations for protective mask development: A remote mask usability evaluation.Applied ergonomics · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Contextually adapted functional and dysfunctional presenteeism during protracted conflict.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Personal protective equipment stockpile practices: a document and scoping review.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Review
- Hardship, coping, and joy: ACPs' experiences of working through the COVID-19 pandemic.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025Article
- Overcoming barriers to medical countermeasures: Strengthening global biosecurity.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Review
- Three years of pandemic stress and staffing challenges: a retrospective qualitative study of COVID-19 impacts on frontline healthcare workers' mental health and wellbeing.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Pandemic planning for primary care in Southwestern Ontario: protocol for a sequential multiple-methods design.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Secondary stressors and their psychosocial impacts on healthcare staff: lessons from a qualitative systematic review from the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.BJPsych open · 2025Review
- Investigating the enablers and barriers for hypertension control in Dakar: a qualitative system effectiveness study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- "It's sink or swim for us": The lived experiences of Filipino nurses in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic.Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare · 2025Article
- Surge capacity and practice management challenges of Canadian family physicians during COVID-19: a qualitative study.Human resources for health · 2025Article
- Telephonic verbal autopsies among adults in South Africa: a feasibility and acceptability pilot study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Experiences and reflections of doctors on the operations of designated clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Perceptions about COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers in Rwanda: A mixed-methods study.Journal of public health in Africa · 2025Article
- Managing COVID-19 care in the pandemic context: impact of family health coverage.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2025Article
- Stress and PTSD levels among Hamad Medical Corporation Paramedics before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Qatar medical journal · 2025Article
84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo report frontline healthcare workers' (HCWs) experiences with personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. To understand HCWs' fears and concerns surrounding PPE, their experiences following its guidance and how these affected their perceived ability to deliver care during the COVID-19 pandemic.
designA rapid qualitative appraisal study combining three sources of data: semistructured in-depth telephone interviews with frontline HCWs (n=46), media reports (n=39 newspaper articles and 145 000 social media posts) and government PPE policies (n=25).
participantsInterview participants were HCWs purposively sampled from critical care, emergency and respiratory departments as well as redeployed HCWs from primary, secondary and tertiary care centres across the UK.
resultsA major concern was running out of PPE, putting HCWs and patients at risk of infection. Following national level guidance was often not feasible when there were shortages, leading to reuse and improvisation of PPE. Frequently changing guidelines generated confusion and distrust. PPE was reserved for high-risk secondary care settings and this translated into HCWs outside these settings feeling inadequately protected. Participants were concerned about differential access to adequate PPE, particularly for women and Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic HCWs. Participants continued delivering care despite the physical discomfort, practical problems and communication barriers associated with PPE use.
conclusionThis study found that frontline HCWs persisted in caring for their patients despite multiple challenges including inappropriate provision of PPE, inadequate training and inconsistent guidance. In order to effectively care for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, frontline HCWs need appropriate provision of PPE, training in its use as well as comprehensive and consistent guidance. These needs must be addressed in order to protect the health and well-being of the most valuable healthcare resource in the COVID-19 pandemic: our HCWs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.