Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33472787›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

REACT study protocol: resilience after the COVID-19 threat (REACT) in adolescents.

Alicia Joanne Smith, Laura Moreno-López, Eugenia Davidson, Maria Dauvermann, Sofia Orellana, Emma Soneson, Konstantinos Ioannidis, Muzaffer Kaser, Anne-Laura van Harmelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alicia Joanne SmithDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK alicia.smith@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2808-3306
Laura Moreno-LópezDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3687-7237
Eugenia DavidsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Maria DauvermannDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2873-8512
Sofia OrellanaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Emma SonesonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Konstantinos IoannidisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Muzaffer KaserDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Anne-Laura van HarmelenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCOVID-19-related social isolation and stress may have significant mental health effects, including post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression. These factors are thought to disproportionately affect populations at risk of psychopathology, such as adolescents with a history of childhood adversity (CA). Therefore, examining which factors may buffer the impact of COVID-19-related stress and isolation in vulnerable adolescents is critical. The Resilience After the COVID-19 Threat (REACT) study assesses whether emotion regulation capacity, inflammation and neuroimmune responses to stress induced in the laboratory prior to the pandemic predict responses to COVID-19-related social isolation and stress in adolescents with CA. We aim to elucidate the mechanisms that enable vulnerable adolescents to maintain or regain good mental health when confronted with COVID-19. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We recruited 79 adolescents aged 16-26 with CA experiences from the Resilience After Individual Stress Exposure study in which we assessed emotion regulation, neural and immune stress responses to an acute stress task. Our sample completed questionnaires at the start of the UK lockdown ('baseline'; April 2020) and three (July 2020) and 6 months later (October 2020) providing crucial longitudinal information across phases of the pandemic progression and government response. The questionnaires assess (1) mental health, (2) number and severity of life events, (3) physical health, (4) stress perception and (5) loneliness and friendship support. We will use multilevel modelling to examine whether individual differences at baseline are associated with responses to COVID-19-related social isolation and stress. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Cambridge Psychology Research Ethics Committee (PRE.2020.037). Results of the REACT study will be disseminated in publications in scientific peer-reviewed journals, presentations at scientific conferences and meetings, publications and presentations for the general public, and through social media.

Indexed as

Mental HealthResilience, PsychologicalStress, PsychologicalAdolescentCOVID-19HumansLonelinessResearch DesignSocial IsolationSurveys and Questionnaireschild & adolescent psychiatryCOVID-19neurobiologypsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID33472787
PMCPMC7818833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.