Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33472786›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol.

Luciana G Macedo, Paul W Hodges, Geoff Bostick, Mark Hancock, Maude Laberge, Steven Hanna, Greg Spadoni, Anita Gross, Julia Schneider

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04283409 (Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? Predicting Response to Exercise Treatments for Patients With Low Back Pain - a Validation Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04283409 nacompletednot on this map

Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? Predicting Response to Exercise Treatments for Patients With Low Back Pain - a Validation Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2020 to 2025Enrolled425ConditionsNon-specific Low Back PainArmsGraded activity, Motor Control Exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Luciana G MacedoSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada macedol@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1840-2951
Paul W HodgesSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Geoff BostickDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Mark HancockDepartment of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Maude LabergeFaculty of Administration, Universite Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1274-136X
Steven HannaDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Greg SpadoniSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Anita GrossSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Julia SchneiderSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
McMaster University · CAMacquarie University · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

CIHR 165952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExercise therapy is the most recommended treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP). Effect sizes for exercises are usually small to moderate and could be due to the heterogeneity of people presenting with LBP. Thus, if patients could be better matched to exercise based on individual factors, then the effects of treatment could be greater. A recently published study provided evidence of better outcomes when patients are matched to the appropriate exercise type. The study demonstrated that a 15-item questionnaire, the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire (LSIQ), could identify patients who responded best to one of the two exercise approaches for LBP (motor control and graded activity). The primary aim of the current study isill be to evaluate whether preidentified baseline characteristics, including the LSIQ, can modify the response to two of the most common exercise therapies for non-specific LBP. Secondary aims include an economic evaluations with a cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants (n=414) will be recruited by primary care professionals and randomised (1:1) to receive motor control exercises or graded activity. Participants will undergo 12 sessions of exercise therapy over an 8-week period. The primary outcome will be physical function at 2 months using the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes will be pain intensity, function and quality of life measured at 2, 6 and 12 months. Potential effect modifiers will be the LSIQ, self-efficacy, coping strategies, kinesiophobia and measures of nociceptive pain and central sensitisation. We will construct linear mixed models with terms for participants (fixed), treatment group, predictor (potential effect modifier), treatment group×predictor (potential effect modifier), physiotherapists, treatment group×physiotherapists and baseline score for the dependent variable. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethics approval from the Hamilton Integrate Research Ethics Board. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04283409.

Indexed as

Low Back PainExerciseExercise TherapyHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcomeback painorthopaedic & trauma surgerypublic healthrehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID33472786
PMCPMC7818834
OpenAlexW3121758722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.