Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33472707›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2021

Vocational rehabilitation to enhance return to work after trauma (ROWTATE): protocol for a non-randomised single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study.

Denise Kendrick, Roshan das Nair, Blerina Kellezi, Richard Morriss, Jade Kettlewell, Jain Holmes, Stephen Timmons, Kay Bridger, Priya Patel, Adam Brooks and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Return to work after major trauma: a systematic review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement in Clinical Trials: A Multi-Perspective Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the ROWTATE Programme.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Qualitative Study to Understand the Impact of Caring for Traumatic Injury Survivors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Denise KendrickSchool of Medicine, University Park, Floor 13, Tower Building, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. denise.kendrick@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3603-6542
Roshan das NairSchool of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK.
Blerina KelleziDivision of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Burton Street, Nottingham, NG1 4BU, UK.
Richard MorrissSchool of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK.
Jade KettlewellCentre for Health Innovation, Leadership and Learning, Nottingham University Business School, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK.
Jain HolmesSchool of Medicine, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Stephen TimmonsCentre for Health Innovation, Leadership and Learning, Nottingham University Business School, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK.
Kay BridgerSchool of Medicine, University Park, Floor 13, Tower Building, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Priya PatelCentre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark St, London, E1 2AT, UK.
Adam BrooksNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Karen HoffmanCentre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark St, London, E1 2AT, UK.
Kathryn RadfordSchool of Medicine, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
ROWTATE study team
University of Nottingham · GBInstitute of Mental Health · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0617-20001National Institute for Health Research RP-PG-0617-20001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic injuries are common amongst working-age adults. Survivors often experience physical and psychological problems, reduced quality of life and difficulty returning to work. Vocational rehabilitation improves work outcomes for a range of conditions but evidence of effectiveness for those with traumatic injuries is lacking. This study assesses feasibility of delivering a vocational rehabilitation intervention to enhance return to work and improve quality of life and wellbeing in people with at least moderate trauma to inform design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT).

methodsNon-randomised, single-arm, multi-centre mixed-methods feasibility study with nested case studies and qualitative study. The case studies comprise interviews, observations of clinical contacts and review of clinical records. The qualitative study comprises interviews and/or focus groups. Participants will be recruited from two UK major trauma centres. Participants will comprise 40 patients aged 16-69 with an injury severity score of > 8 who will receive the intervention and complete questionnaires. Interviews will be conducted with 10 patients and their occupational therapists (OTs), clinical psychologists (CPs), employers and commissioners of rehabilitation services. Fidelity will be assessed in up to six patients by observations of OT and CP-patient contacts, review of patient records and intervention case report forms. OT and CP training will be evaluated using questionnaires and competence to deliver the intervention assessed using a team objective structured clinical examination and written task. Patients participating in and those declining participation in the study will be invited to take part in interviews/focus groups to explore barriers and facilitators to recruitment and retention. Outcomes include recruitment and retention rates, intervention fidelity, OT and CP competence to deliver the intervention, experiences of delivering or receiving the intervention and factors likely to influence definitive trial delivery. DISCUSSION: Effective vocational rehabilitation interventions to enhance return to work amongst trauma patients are urgently needed because return to work is often delayed, with detrimental effects on health, financial stability, healthcare resource use and wider society. This protocol describes a feasibility study delivering a complex intervention to enhance return to work in those with at least moderate trauma.

trial registrationISRCTN: 74668529 . Prospectively registered on 23 January 20.

Indexed as

InjuryOccupationPsychological outcomesTraumaVocational rehabilitationWork

Identifiers

PMID33472707
PMCPMC7816441
OpenAlexW3124560816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.