ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2021
Simulation-based team training in time-critical clinical presentations in emergency medicine and critical care: a review of the literature.
Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A novel evaluation tool for combat trauma simulation: Delphi expert panel consensus report.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Article
- Association between prolonged Emergency Department stay and Intensive Care Unit mortality among patients at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026Article
- Using Generative AI to Appraise the Quality of Medical Education Research Studies: Agreement Between AI-Generated and Human MERSQI Scores.AEM education and training · 2026Article
- PHTLS training increases knowledge but paradoxically decreases self-efficacy in emergency healthcare professionals: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Simulation deficit in cardiology training: a missed opportunity for the modern trainee.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2026Article
- Critical illness in prisons: a multi-methods analysis of reported healthcare safety incidents in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
- Simulation-based education in an emergency medicine clerkship in Qatar: impact on academic performance and student perceptions.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of a pilot simulation training on interdisciplinary closed-loop communication and time to critical actions at an emergency centre in Burundi.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Transferring health professionals social and cognitive skills: key findings from a qualitative investigation.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Simulation-based medical education in Canadian anesthesiology academic institutions: a national survey.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024Article
- TEAMs go VR-validating the TEAM in a virtual reality (VR) medical team training.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2024Article
- Simulation-based team training for healthcare professionals in pediatric departments: study protocol for a nonrandomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Body donor reperfusion and re-ventilation in medical training: an Italian study testing SimLife®.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Sepsis and Clinical Simulation: What Is New? (and Old).Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Simulation: past, present, and future.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Technology-enhanced simulation in emergency medicine: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis 1991-2021.AEM education and training · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of simulation-based team training has increased over the past decades. Simulation-based team training within emergency medicine and critical care contexts is best known for its use by trauma teams and teams involved in cardiac arrest. In the domain of emergency medicine, simulation-based team training is also used for other typical time-critical clinical presentations. We aimed to review the existing literature and current state of evidence pertaining to non-technical skills obtained via simulation-based team training in emergency medicine and critical care contexts, excluding trauma and cardiac arrest contexts.
methodsThis systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Before the initiation of the study, the protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database. We conducted a systematic literature search of 10 years of publications, up to December 17, 2019, in the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Two authors independently reviewed all the studies and extracted data.
resultsOf the 456 studies screened, 29 trials were subjected to full-text review, and 13 studies were included in the final review. None of the studies was randomized controlled trials, and no studies compared simulation training to different modalities of training. Studies were heterogeneous; they applied simulation-training concepts of different durations and intensities and used different outcome measures for non-technical skills. Two studies reached Kirkpatrick level 3. Out of the remaining 11 studies, nine reached Kirkpatrick level 2, and two reached Kirkpatrick level 1.
conclusionsThe literature on simulation-based team training in emergency medicine is heterogeneous and sparse, but somewhat supports the hypothesis that simulation-based team training is beneficial to teams' knowledge and attitudes toward non-technical skills (Kirkpatrick level 2). Randomized trials are called for to clarify the effect of simulation compared to other modalities of team training. Future research should focus on the transfer of skills and investigate improvements in patient outcomes (Kirkpatrick level 4).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.