Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33472654›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2021

Qualitative evaluation of the Autism Behavior Inventory: use of cognitive interviewing to establish validity of a caregiver report scale for autism spectrum disorder.

Gahan Pandina, Seth Ness, Jeremiah Trudeau, Sonja Stringer, Naomi Knoble, William R Lenderking, Abigail Bangerter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gahan PandinaDepartment of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Pennington, NJ, 08534, USA. gpandina@its.jnj.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0050-3575
Seth NessDepartment of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Jeremiah TrudeauDepartment of Patient Reported Outcomes, Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Sonja StringerEvidera, Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Naomi KnobleEvidera, Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC, Bethesda, MD, USA.
William R LenderkingEvidera, Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abigail BangerterDepartment of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Autism Behavior Inventory (ABI) is an observer-reported outcome scale measuring core and associated features of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Extensive scale development (reported elsewhere) took place, in alignment with the Food and Drug Administration's patient-reported outcome guidance, to address the need for instruments to measure change and severity of ASD symptoms.

methodsCognitive interviewing was used to confirm understanding and content validity of the scale prior to its use in clinical trials. Respondents were caregivers of individuals with ASD (N = 50). Interviews used a hybrid of the "think-aloud" and verbal probing approach to assess ABI's content validity and participant understanding of the instrument, including: item clarity and relevance; item interpretation; appropriateness of response scales; and clarity of instructions. Audio-recordings of the interviews were transcribed for qualitative data analysis. The scale was revised based on participant feedback and tested in a second round of interviews (round 1 N = 38, round 2 N = 12).

resultsIn total, 67/70 items reached ≥ 90% understandability across participants. Caregivers were able to select an appropriate response from the options available and reported finding the examples helpful. Based on participant feedback, instructions were simplified, 8 items were removed, and 10 items were reworded. The final revised 62-item scale was presented in round 2, where caregivers reported readily understanding the instructions, response options, and 61/62 items reached ≥ 90% understandability.

conclusionsCognitive interviews with caregivers of a diverse sample of individuals with ASD confirm the content validity and relevance of the ABI to assess core and associated symptoms of ASD.

Indexed as

ComprehensionEvaluation Studies as TopicAdolescentAdultAutism Spectrum DisorderBehavior Rating ScaleCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAutismCaregiver-reported outcomesCognitive interview

Identifiers

PMID33472654
PMCPMC7819236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.