Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33472647›Full record

SynthesisHealth research policy and systems2021

Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews.

Josephine Ocloo, Sara Garfield, Bryony Dean Franklin, Shoba Dawson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health research policy and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07110779 (Telenursing in Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 241 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
241citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07110779 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Telenursing in Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Clinical Trial and Patient Collaboration

TypeinterventionalSponsorFernanda Maria Alves LimaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Cardiovascular DiseasesArmsTelenursing consultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

241 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Evaluating Process and Outcomes of Public Involvement in Applied Health and Social Care Research: A Rapid Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  8. Patient and Public Involvement Work With Parents of Children With Life-Limiting Conditions and Bereaved Parents: A Rapid Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Universal Child Mental Health Screening for Parents: a Systematic Review of the Evidence.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. An umbrella review of reviews on challenges to meaningful adolescent involvement in health research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Article
  15. Equitable Patient and Public Involvement Strategies for Scaling Health and Social Care Interventions: A Consensus Study Inspired by Delphi Methods.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  16. Enhancing the Prospective Acceptability of a Paediatric Speech and Language Therapy Intervention With Parents From Under-Represented Communities.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

181 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Josephine OclooCentre for Implementation Science, Health Services, Population and Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, UK. Josephine.ocloo@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0027-9091
Sara GarfieldImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Bryony Dean FranklinImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Shoba DawsonCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence of patient and public involvement (PPI) in healthcare in the UK can be traced as far back as the 1970s. More recently, campaigns by harmed patients have led to a renewed focus on strengthening PPI. There is a growing awareness of the benefits of PPI in research as well as a need to address power inequities and a lack of diversity and inclusion. This review was undertaken to look at evidence for theories, barriers and enablers in PPI across health, social care and patient safety that could be used to strengthen PPI and address a perceived knowledge and theory gap with PPI in patient safety.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO from inception to August 2018, using both MeSH and free-text terms to identify published empirical literature. Protocols in PROSPERO were also searched to identify any systematic reviews in progress. The extracted information was analysed using a narrative approach, which synthesises data using a descriptive method.

resultsForty-two reviews were identified and grouped by key outcomes. Twenty-two papers mentioned theory in some form, 31 mentioned equality and diversity (although with no theory mentioned in this area), and only 19 cited equality and diversity as a barrier or enabler. Thirty-four reviews identified barriers and enablers at different organisational levels: personal/individual; attitudes; health professional; roles and expectations; knowledge, information and communication; financing and resourcing; training; general support; recruitment and representation, PPI methods and working with communities and addressing power dynamics.

conclusionsThe review findings suggest that a commitment to PPI and partnership working is dependent on taking a whole system approach. This needs to consider the complex individual and organisational enablers and constraints to this process and address imbalances of power experienced by different groups. Addressing equality and diversity and use of a theory-driven approach to guide PPI are neglected areas. The long tradition of involvement across health and social care can provide considerable expertise in thinking about ways to strengthen approaches to PPI. This is especially important in patient safety, with a much newer tradition of developing PPI than other areas of healthcare.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPatient SafetySocial SupportHumansUnited KingdomBarriers and enablersHealthPatient and public involvementSocial care and patient safetySystematic review of reviewsTheory

Identifiers

PMID33472647
PMCPMC7816359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.