Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33472568›Full record

ReviewGlobal health action2021

COVID-19 in Germany and China: mitigation versus elimination strategy.

Guangyu Lu, Oliver Razum, Albrecht Jahn, Yuying Zhang, Brett Sutton, Devi Sridhar, Koya Ariyoshi, Lorenz von Seidlein, Olaf Müller

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global health action, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Advantages of the Zero-COVID-19 Strategy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. ["I hope to be informed". Effects of the Corona-Warning-App].Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Rigorous Policy-Making Amid COVID-19 and Beyond: Literature Review and Critical Insights.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guangyu LuDepartment of Public Health, Medical College, Yangzhou University , Yangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2568-7091
Oliver RazumDepartment of Epidemiology & International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University , Bielefeld, Germany.
Albrecht JahnInstitute of Global Health, Medical School, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany.
Yuying ZhangDepartment of Public Health, Medical College, Yangzhou University , Yangzhou, China.
Brett SuttonMinistry of Health , Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9440-0632
Devi SridharGlobal Health Governance Programme, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5058-9023
Koya AriyoshiSchool of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University , Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1468-5296
Lorenz von SeidleinMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University , Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0282-6469
Olaf MüllerInstitute of Global Health, Medical School, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7852-3088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ChinaCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksGermanyHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2ChinaCOVID-19Germanyhealth policypandemic

Identifiers

PMID33472568
PMCPMC7833051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.