Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33472441›Full record

SynthesisJournal of investigative medicine high impact case reports

Jejunal Dieulafoy's Lesion: A Systematic Review of Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management.

Adnan Malik, Faisal Inayat, Muhammad Hassan Naeem Goraya, Talal Almas, Rizwan Ishtiaq, Sohira Malik, Zahid Ijaz Tarar

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dieulafoy's Lesion in the Esophagus Causing Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Concise Review.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Appendiceal bleeding: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Adnan MalikLoyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Faisal InayatAllama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-7576-7319
Muhammad Hassan Naeem GorayaServices Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Talal AlmasRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Rizwan IshtiaqMercy St. Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA.
Sohira MalikNishter Medical University, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.
Zahid Ijaz TararUniversity of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA.
Allama Iqbal Medical College · PKLoyola University Medical Center · USMercy St. Vincent Medical Center · USNishtar Medical College and Hospital · PKRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEServices Institute of Medical Sciences · PKUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Jejunal Dieulafoy's lesion is an exceedingly rare but important cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. It frequently presents as a diagnostic and therapeutic conundrum due to the rare occurrence, intermittent bleeding symptoms often requiring prompt clinical action, variability in the detection and treatment methods, and the risk of rebleeding. We performed a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases regarding jejunal Dieulafoy's lesio from inception till June 2020. A total of 136 cases were retrieved from 76 articles. The mean age was 55 ± 24 years, with 55% of cases reported in males. Patients commonly presented with melena (33%), obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding (29%), and hemodynamic compromise (20%). Hypertension (26%), prior gastrointestinal surgery (14%), and valvular heart disease (13%) were the major underlying disorders. Conventional endoscopy often failed but single- and double-balloon enteroscopy identified the lesion in 96% and 98% of patients, respectively. There was no consensus on the treatment. Endoscopic therapy was instituted in 64% of patients. Combination therapy (34%) with two or more endoscopic modalities, was the preferred approach. With regard to endoscopic monotherapy, hemoclipping (19%) and argon plasma coagulation (4%) were frequently employed procedures. Furthermore, direct surgical intervention in 32% and angiographic embolization was performed in 4% of patients. The rebleeding rate was 13.4%, with a mean follow-up duration of 17.6 ± 21.98 months. The overall mortality rate was 4.4%. Jejunal Dieulafoy's lesion is still difficult to diagnose and manage. Although the standard diagnostic and therapeutic modalities remain to be determined, device-assisted enteroscopy might yield promising outcomes.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle Agedclinical outcomesdiagnosisDieulafoy’s lesionevaluationgastrointestinal bleedingjejunummanagementtherapeutic endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID33472441
PMCPMC7829607
OpenAlexW3124202678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.