Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33472412›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2022

Allograft Subsidence Decreases Postoperative Segmental Lordosis With Minimal Effect on Global Alignment Following ACDF.

Zachariah W Pinter, Anthony Mikula, Matthew Shirley, Ashley Xiong, Scott Wagner, Benjamin D Elder, Brett A Freedman, Ahmad Nassr, Mohamad Bydon, Bradford Currier and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Is preoperative cervical range of motion associated with cage subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zachariah W PinterDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3011-0991
Anthony MikulaDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Matthew ShirleyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ashley XiongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Scott WagnerWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Benjamin D ElderDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Brett A FreedmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3408-0163
Ahmad NassrDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mohamad BydonDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0543-396X
Bradford CurrierDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
I David KayeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christopher KeplerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Arjun S SebastianDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · USThomas Jefferson University · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study.

objectiveStudies investigating the impact of interbody subsidence in ACDF suggest a correlation between subsidence and worse radiographic and patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess whether allograft subsidence assessed on CT is associated with worse cervical alignment.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of a prospective cohort of patients undergoing 1 to 3 level ACDF. Cervical alignment was assessed on standing radiographs performed preoperatively, less than 2 months postoperatively, and greater than 6 months postoperatively. Allograft subsidence was assessed on CT scan performed at least 6 months postoperatively. Patients with at least 1 level demonstrating greater than 4mm of cage subsidence were classified as severe subsidence. Student's t-test was used to compare all means between groups.

resultsWe identified 66 patients for inclusion, including 56 patients with non-severe subsidence and 10 patients with severe subsidence. For the entire cohort, there was a significant increase in C2-7 Lordosis (p = 0.005) and Segmental Lordosis (p < 0.00 001) from preoperative to early postoperative. On comparison of severely and non-severely subsided levels, severely subsided levels demonstrated a significantly greater loss of segmental lordosis from early to mid-term follow-up than non-severely subsided levels (-4.89 versus -2.59 degrees, p < 0.0001), manifesting as a significantly lower segmental lordosis at >6 months postoperative (0.54 versus 3.82 degrees, p < 0.00 001). There were no significant differences in global cervical alignment parameters between patients with severe and non-severe subsidence.

conclusionsSevere subsidence is associated with a significant increase in loss of segmental lordosis, but has minimal effect on global cervical alignment parameters.

Indexed as

allograftcervical alignmentinterbodysegmental lordosissubsidence

Identifiers

PMID33472412
PMCPMC9609513
OpenAlexW3123144690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.