Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33472356›Full record

ReviewHaematologica2021

Persistence of myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib: biology and clinical implications.

David M Ross, Jeffrey J Babon, Denis Tvorogov, Daniel Thomas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haematologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. JAK Inhibitors for Myelofibrosis: Strengths and Limitations.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David M RossDepartment of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide; Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology, Adelaide; Precision Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, and Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide. david.ross@sa.gov.au.
Jeffrey J BabonThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research and Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville.
Denis TvorogovCentre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology.
Daniel ThomasPrecision Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, and Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide.
Centre for Cancer Biology · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUUniversity of South Australia · AUWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation of JAK-STAT signaling is one of the hallmarks of myelofibrosis, a myeloproliferative neoplasm that leads to inflammation, progressive bone marrow failure, and a risk of leukemic transformation. Around 90% of patients with myelofibrosis have a mutation in JAK2, MPL, or CALR: so-called 'driver' mutations that lead to activation of JAK2. Ruxolitinib, and other JAK2 inhibitors in clinical use, provide clinical benefit but do not have a major impact on the abnormal hematopoietic clone. This phenomenon is termed 'persistence', in contrast to usual patterns of resistance. Multiple groups have shown that type 1 inhibitors of JAK2, which bind the active conformation of the enzyme, lead to JAK2 becoming resistant to degradation with consequent accumulation of phospho-JAK2. In turn, this can lead to exacerbation of inflammatory manifestations when the JAK inhibitor is discontinued, and it may also contribute to disease persistence. The ways in which JAK2 V617F and CALR mutations lead to activation of JAK-STAT signaling are incompletely understood. We summarize what is known about pathological JAK-STAT activation in myelofibrosis and how this might lead to future novel therapies for myelofibrosis with greater disease-modifying potential.

Indexed as

Myeloproliferative DisordersPrimary MyelofibrosisBiologyHumansJanus Kinase 2MutationNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesJanus Kinase 2NitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID33472356
PMCPMC8094080
OpenAlexW3123876524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.