ArticleESC heart failure2021
A clinical score for predicting left ventricular reverse remodelling in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing versus Deep Septal Pacing in Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Integrated left ventricular geometry-function phenotypes and long-term outcomes after acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Integrated role of cardiac magnetic resonance and genetics in predicting left ventricular reverse remodelling in dilated and non-dilated cardiomyopathy.European journal of heart failure · 2025Observational
- Electron microscopic findings predict clinical outcomes in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.ESC heart failure · 2025Observational
- Prognostic implications of left ventricular mechanical dispersion in comparison with QRS duration in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Left Ventricular Mechanical Dispersion and Its Value in Combination With Global Longitudinal Strain to Predict Reverse Remodeling in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Prognostic value of advanced lung cancer inflammation index in heart failure patients: A comprehensive analysis.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Recent Trends in Achievement Rates and Time Required for Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling in Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Predicting Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Beyond the Initial Insult: Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction.Cardiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Diverse Concepts in Definitions of Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Theory and Practice.Cardiology research · 2024Review
- Transient Left Ventricular Dysfunction from Cardiomyopathies to Myocardial Viability: When and Why Cardiac Function Recovers.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Restrictive annuloplasty or replacement on reverse remodeling for nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- The potential predictive value of cardiac mechanics for left ventricular reverse remodelling in dilated cardiomyopathy.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Cardiac sympathetic activity and relationship to cardiac events and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- Baseline Blood Pressure and Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling in Dilated Cardiomyopathy with Spontaneous Mechanical Alternans.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Observational
- Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Comprehensive Approach to Diagnosis and Risk Stratification.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy based on arrhythmic risk stratification and left ventricular reverse remodeling prediction.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- Fifteen-year mortality and prognostic factors in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: persistent standardized application of drug therapy and strengthened management may bring about encouraging change in an aging society.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsLeft ventricular reverse remodelling (LVRR) is a well-established predictor of a good prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The prediction of LVRR is important when developing a long-term treatment strategy. This study aimed to assess the clinical predictors of LVRR and establish a scoring system for predicting LVRR in patients with DCM that can be used at any institution. METHODS AND
resultsWe consecutively enrolled 131 patients with DCM and assessed the clinical predictors of LVRR. LVRR was defined as an absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from ≥10% to a final value of >35%, accompanied by a decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) ≥ 10% on echocardiography at 1 ± 0.5 years after a diagnosis of DCM. The mean patient age was 50.1 ± 11.9 years. The mean LVEF was 32.2 ± 9.5%, and the mean LVEDD was 64.1 ± 12.5 mm at diagnosis. LVRR was observed in 45 patients (34%) at 1 ± 0.5 years. In a multivariate analysis, hypertension [odds ratio (OR): 6.86; P = 0.002], no family history of DCM (OR: 10.45; P = 0.037), symptom duration <90 days (OR: 6.72; P < 0.001), LVEF <35% (OR: 13.66; P < 0.0001), and QRS duration <116 ms (OR: 5.94; P = 0.005) were found to be independent predictors of LVRR. We scored the five independent predictors according to the ORs (1 point, 2 points, 1 point, 2 points, and 1 point, respectively), and the total LVRR predicting score was calculated by adding these scores. The LVRR rate was stratified by the LVRR predicting score (0-2 points: 0%; 3 points: 6.7%; 4 points: 17.4%; 5 points: 48.2%; 6 points: 79.2%; and 7 points: 100%). The cut-off value of the LVRR predicting score was >5 in receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve: 0.89; P < 0.0001; sensitivity: 87%; specificity: 78%). An LVRR predicting score of >5 was an independent predictor compared with the presence of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiovascular magnetic resonance or the severity of fibrosis on endomyocardial biopsy (OR: 11.79; 95% confidence interval: 2.40-58.00; P = 0.002).
conclusionsThe LVRR predicting score using five predictors including hypertension, no family history of DCM, symptom duration <90 days, LVEF <35%, and QRS duration <116 ms can stratify the LVRR rate in patients with DCM. The LVRR predicting score may be a useful clinical tool that can be used easily at any institution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.