ReviewWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society2021
Reactive oxygen species during heart regeneration in zebrafish: Lessons for future clinical therapies.
Review in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of regeneration initiating cells during Xenopus laevis tail regeneration.Genome biology · 2024Article
- NGF-releasing Prussian blue nanoparticles for nerve injury repair of lumbar disc herniation.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Article
- Mammalian organ regeneration in spiny mice.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2023Review
- The Emerging Role of Protein Phosphatase in Regeneration.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Metabolic Regulation of Cardiac Regeneration.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Reactive oxygen species during heart regeneration in zebrafish: Lessons for future clinical therapies.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In humans, myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with irreversible damage to heart tissue, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality in patients. By comparison, the zebrafish (Danio rerio) is capable of repairing damaged and injured hearts by activating a full regenerative response. By studying model organisms that can regenerate loss heart tissue following injury, such as the zebrafish, a greater insight will be gained into the molecular pathways that can induce and sustain a regenerative response following injury. There is hope that such information may lead to new treatments or therapies aimed at stimulating a better regenerative response in humans that have suffered heart attacks. Recent findings in zebrafish have highlighted an important role for sustained elevated levels of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), including hydrogen peroxide (H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.