Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33471855›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Avoidance behaviour in laboratory house mice (Musmusculus) and Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) towards predator odours.

Luciana B Adduci, Vanina A León, Annika Schlötelburg, María Busch, Jimena Fraschina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Advances in neural circuits of innate fear defense behavior.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luciana B AdduciFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA), UBA-CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Intendente Güiraldes 2160-Ciudad Universitaria-C1428EGA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Vanina A LeónFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA), UBA-CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Intendente Güiraldes 2160-Ciudad Universitaria-C1428EGA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Annika SchlötelburgDivision of Land Use Systems, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Faculty of Life Science, Institute of Agriculture and Horticulture, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg, Berlin, Germany.
María BuschFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA), UBA-CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Intendente Güiraldes 2160-Ciudad Universitaria-C1428EGA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jimena FraschinaFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA), UBA-CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Intendente Güiraldes 2160-Ciudad Universitaria-C1428EGA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-1321-8362
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mus musculus and Rattus sp. are considered pest species because they reach high densities in urban areas, crop fields and food storage and productive systems such as breeding farms and orchards. Their control relies mainly on rodenticide application, but the effectiveness of this application is reduced due to behavioural responses and resistance. Novel methods are based on the use of chemical signals as odours that may be attractants, repellents or may reduce the reproductive success of pest species. The aim of this paper is to study the aversive effect of TMT, cat urine and cat body odour on predator-inexperienced Mus musculus and Rattus norvegicus under laboratory conditions. The experimental apparatus comprised three boxes connected by PVC pipes in a linear arrangement. In lateral boxes, odour sources or distilled water were introduced, while animals were placed in the central box at the beginning of the experiment. Rats showed freezing behaviour, reduced visits in the presence of TMT and cat fur. Mice reduced their visits with cat body and cat urine. This study provides evidence of the usefulness of using fear responses as a way to control rodent pests, which must be adapted to the environment and species to be applied.

Indexed as

CatsMicePredatory BehaviorRatsAnimalsAvoidance LearningEscape ReactionFemaleMaleOdorantsThiazoles2,4,5 trimethylthiazolineThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID33471855
PMCPMC7817039
OpenAlexW3125767596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.