Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33471403›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2021

The utility of a formative one-station objective structured clinical examination for Substance use disorders in a dental curriculum.

Folarin Odusola, Jennifer L Smith, Eva Turrigiano, Matisyahu Shulman, John T Grbic, James B Fine, Mei-Chen Hu, Edward V Nunes, Adam Bisaga, Frances R Levin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Folarin OdusolaDental Medicine and Director of Clinical Clerkships and Primary Care Medicine in Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8535-4956
Jennifer L SmithClinical Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Eva TurrigianoNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Matisyahu ShulmanClinical Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
John T GrbicDental Medicine and Director of the Division of Foundational Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
James B FineAcademic Affairs, College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Mei-Chen HuDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Edward V NunesPsychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Adam BisagaPsychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Frances R LevinDivision on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · US

Funding

Translational Clinical Research Fellowship on Substance Use DisordersT32DA007294 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Frances Rudnick Levin, Diana M Martinez · 1993 to 2026
$9.3M
Substance Abuse Treatment Development and Clinical Research MentoringK24DA029647 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LEVIN, FRANCES RUDNICK · 2010 to 2019
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA029647NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007294SAMHSA HHS 1H79T1025937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance use disorders (SUD) are chronic relapsing medical conditions characterised by compulsive substance seeking and use. They constitute a substantial disease burden globally. Labelling of persons with SUD has created barriers to treatment but there are effective management strategies. The dental profession has embraced reforms designed to address the SUD epidemic by promoting continuing education for practitioners and initiating curriculum changes in dental schools. Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) is an evidence-based model for managing patients with SUD. The use of a formative 1-station Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) for learning and assessment in SBIRT, operationalised with the MD3 rating scale is presented in this study. In 3 years of implementation, the SBIRT OSCE successfully integrated into the curriculum of the College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University. Mean score of total adherent behaviours was 11.80 (SD =4.23) (range: 2 - 24) and Cronbach's coefficient alpha for across-items reliability in adherent behaviours was 0.66. Adherent behaviours correlated with the global ratings (r = 0.66). Mean of global rating scores were 2.90 (SD =1.01) for collaboration and 2.97 (SD =1.00) for empathy and the global rating scores correlated with each other (r = 0.85). Histograms of global rating scores resembled normal distribution. The 1-station OSCE is a good model for learning about SBIRT. Psychometric analysis was useful in understanding the underlying construct of the MD3 rating scale and supported its reliability, validity and utility in dental education.

Indexed as

Education, DentalSubstance-Related DisordersClinical CompetenceCurriculumHumansReferral and ConsultationReproducibility of ResultsDental CurriculumObjective Structured Clinical ExaminationPsychometric analysisScreening Brief Intervention and Referral to TreatmentSubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID33471403
PMCPMC8289927
OpenAlexW3121339732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.