ArticleUpdates in surgery2021
Outcome of bile leakage following liver resection with hepaticojejunostomy for liver cancer.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to investigate contemporary management and outcomes of bile leakage in patients who underwent hepatectomy with hepaticojejunostomy for liver malignancy. The NSQIP database was used to study clinical data of patients who underwent a hepatectomy with hepaticojejunostomy for a primary hepatobiliary cancer and developed bile leakage between 1/2014 and 12/2017. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to investigate outcomes. Five hundred patients underwent a hepatectomy with hepaticojejunostomy for a malignant primary hepatobiliary cancer (41% intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 38.2% hilar cholangiocarcinoma, 9.8% hepatocellular carcinoma, 6% gallbladder cancer, and 5% others). The rate of bile leakage was 33.4%. Most patients (90.4%) did not require re-exploration. In 77 of 157 patients (49.1%), bile leakages were contained with intraoperatively placed drain(s) and no additional surgical intervention was required. A total of 71 patients (42.5%)-including 64 patients with intraoperative drains-required interventional radiology (IR)-guided drainage, with a 88.7% success rate. A total of 16 patients (9.6%) required re-exploration to control the leakage, with 8 of them having undergone failed IR-drainage. When running multivariate analysis, post-hepatectomy liver failure (AOR: 158.26, P < 0.01), preoperative sepsis (AOR: 36.24, P = 0.03), and smoking (AOR: 14.07, P = 0.03) were significantly associated with mortality of patients. Biliary leakage is relatively common following hepatectomy with hepaticojejunostomy for liver malignancy (33.4%), but most patients (90.4%) do not require re-exploration. Intraoperatively placed drains successfully controlled 46.7% of bile leakages. IR-guided drain placement had a 88.7% success rate for adequate leak control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.