Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33471228›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2021

Repeatability of lateralisation in mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki despite evidence for turn alternation in detour tests.

Ivan M Vinogradov, Michael D Jennions, Teresa Neeman, Rebecca J Fox

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Visual Lateralisation in Female GuppiesEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Teleosts as behaviour test models for social stress.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ivan M VinogradovDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia. ivan.vinogradov@anu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6574-7709
Michael D JennionsDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.
Teresa NeemanBiological Data Science Institute, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.
Rebecca J FoxDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.

Funding

Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council DP190100279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Akin to handedness in humans, some animals show a preference for moving to the left or right. This is often attributed to lateralised cognitive functions and eye dominance, which, in turn, influences their behaviour. In fishes, behavioural lateralisation has been tested using detour mazes for over 20 years. Studies report that certain individuals are more likely to approach predators or potential mates from one direction. These findings imply that the lateralisation behaviour of individuals is repeatable, but this is rarely confirmed through multiple testing of each individual over time. Here we quantify the repeatability of turning behaviour by female mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) in a double sided T-maze. Each female was tested three times in each of six treatments: when approaching other females, males, or an empty space; and when able to swim freely or when forced to choose by being herded from behind with a net. Although there was no turning bias based on the mean population response, we detected significant repeatability of lateralisation in five of the six treatments (R = 0.251-0.625). This is noteworthy as we also found that individuals tended to alternate between left and right turns, meaning that they tend to move back and forth along one wall of the double-sided T-maze. Furthermore, we found evidence for this wall following when re-analysing data from a previous study. We discuss potential explanations for this phenomenon, and its implications for study design.

Indexed as

CyprinodontiformesAnimalsFemaleFunctional LateralitySwimmingBehavioural lateralityCerebral lateralisationCognitionPoeciliidaeT-maze test

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.