Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33471209›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2021

[Prediction and prevention of chronic postoperative pain].

Esther Pogatzki-Zahn

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. [Psychosocial factors in the prevention of pain].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Esther Pogatzki-ZahnKlinik für Anästhesiologie, operative Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland. pogatzki@anit.uni-muenster.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic postoperative pain has been identified as a major medical and socioeconomic problem. A prevention of the chronification processes is potentially possible and preventive treatment could start early (e.g. preoperatively). So far, however, evidence for the effectiveness of preventive strategies is basically low. Important reasons for this dilemma are the lack of appropriate risk assessment as well as effective and mechanism-based preventive (procedure-sepcific) strategies for the chronification process, a lack of stratification of treatment approaches and a so far barely investigated combination of various treatment approaches. In this review article recent findings on the appropriate identification of patients at risk for developing postoperative chronic pain are presented, predictive models for the valid estimation of the individual risk of patients are assessed and studies on pharmaceutical and regional analgesia techniques influencing the pain chronification process are discussed. As a chronification process is, however, extremely complex and dynamic and also necessitates adaptation of the prevention during the course of the process, only combinations of treatment, interdisciplinary and if necessary even longer term approaches might be successful. Future studies are needed to address with which preventive treatment strategies and in which patients chronic pain after surgery can effectively be prevented.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPostoperative PainAnesthesia, ConductionHumansAnalgesia, preventiveCombined modality therapyModels, biopsychosocialPain chronificationRisk stratification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.