Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33471194›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2021

In vitro cytotoxicity of different dental resin-cements on human cell lines.

Freya Diemer, Helmut Stark, Ernst-Heinrich Helfgen, Norbert Enkling, Rainer Probstmeier, Jochen Winter, Dominik Kraus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Freya DiemerDepartment of Oral Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Helmut StarkDepartment of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ernst-Heinrich HelfgenDepartment of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Norbert EnklingDepartment of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Rainer ProbstmeierNeuro- and Tumor Cell Biology Group, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jochen WinterDepartment of Periodontology, Operative and Preventive Dentistry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Dominik KrausDepartment of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. dominik.kraus@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-5065
University of Bonn · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adhesive resin-cements are increasingly used in modern dentistry. Nevertheless, released substances from resin materials have been shown to cause cellular toxic effects. Disc-shaped specimens from 12 different resin cements and one conventional zinc phosphate cement were prepared and used for direct stimulation of five different human cell lines via transwell cell culture system or in an indirect way using conditioned cell culture media. Cytotoxicity was determined using LDH and BCA assays. All tested cements led to a decrease of cell viability but to a distinct extent depending on cell type, luting material, and cytotoxicity assay. In general, cements exhibited a more pronounced cytotoxicity in direct stimulation experiments compared to stimulations using conditioned media. Interestingly, the conventional zinc phosphate cement showed the lowest impact on cell viability. On cellular level, highest cytotoxic effects were detected in osteoblastic cell lines. All resin cements reduced cell viability of human cells with significant differences depending on cell type and cement material. Especially, osteoblastic cells demonstrated a tremendous increase of cytotoxicity after cement exposure. Although the results of this in vitro study cannot be transferred directly to a clinical setting, it shows that eluted substances from resin cements may disturb osteoblastic homeostasis that in turn could lead to conditions favoring peri-implant bone destruction. Thus, the wide use of resin cements in every clinical situation should be scrutinized. A correct use with complete removal of all cement residues and a sufficient polymerization should be given the utmost attention in clinical usage.

Indexed as

Materials TestingA549 CellsCell LineCell SurvivalCulture Media, ConditionedDental CementsGlass Ionomer CementsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesKeratinocytesL-Lactate DehydrogenaseOsteoblastsPhosphatesPolymerizationResin CementsResins, SyntheticCulture Media, ConditionedDental CementsGlass Ionomer CementsL-Lactate DehydrogenasePhosphatesResin CementsResins, SyntheticZinc Compoundszinc phosphateZinc Phosphate Cement

Identifiers

PMID33471194
PMCPMC7817560
OpenAlexW3122934929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.