Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33471187›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021

Features of durable response and treatment efficacy for capecitabine monotherapy in advanced breast cancer: real-world evidence from a large single-centre cohort.

S Thijssen, H Wildiers, K Punie, B Beuselinck, P Clement, C Remmerie, P Berteloot, S Han, E Van Nieuwenhuysen, T Van Gorp and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Effect of capecitabine as monotherapy for HER2 normal metastatic breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S ThijssenDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. soetkinthijssen24@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3448-5264
H WildiersDepartment of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8990-7837
K PunieDepartment of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1162-7963
B BeuselinckDepartment of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7427-9102
P ClementDepartment of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-4060
C RemmerieDepartment of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
P BertelootDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
S HanDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7476-3372
E Van NieuwenhuysenDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5432-1828
T Van GorpDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1573-8716
I VergoteDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7589-8981
A SmeetsDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5091-6602
I NevelsteenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4380-7413
G FlorisDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2391-5425
C WeltensDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7790-7151
J MentenDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2805-1953
H JanssenDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
A LaenenDepartment of Biostatistics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
P NevenDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1434-9460
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn metastatic breast cancer (MBC) population treated with capecitabine monotherapy, we investigated clinical-pathological features as possible biomarkers for the oncological outcome.

methodsRetrospective study of consecutive MBC patients treated at University Hospitals Leuven starting capecitabine between 1999 and 2017. The primary endpoint was the durable response (DR), defined as non-progressive disease for > 52 weeks. Other main endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS).

resultsWe included 506 patients; mean age at primary breast cancer diagnosis was 51.2 years; 18.2% had de novo MBC; 98.8% were pre-treated with taxanes and/or anthracycline. DR was reached in 11.6%. Patients with DR, as compared to those without DR, were more likely oestrogen receptor (ER) positive (91.5% vs. 76.8%, p = 0.010) at first diagnosis, had a lower incidence of lymph node (LN) involvement (35.6% vs. 49.9%, p = 0.039) before starting capecitabine, were more likely to present with metastases limited to ≤ 2 involved sites (54.2% vs. 38.5%, p = 0.020) and time from metastasis to start of capecitabine was longer (mean 3.5 vs. 2.7 years, p = 0.020). ORR was 22%. Median TTP and OS were 28 and 58 weeks, respectively. In multivariate analysis (only performed for TTP), ER positivity (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.529, p < 0.0001), HER2 negativity (HR = 0.582, p = 0.024), absence of LN (HR = 0.751, p = 0.008) and liver involvement (HR = 0.746, p = 0.013), older age at capecitabine start (HR = 0.925, p < 0.0001) and younger age at diagnosis of MBC (HR = 0.935, p = 0.001) were significant features of longer TTP.

conclusionOur data display relevant clinical-pathological features associated with DR and TTP in patients receiving capecitabine monotherapy for MBC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBreast NeoplasmsCapecitabineCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCapecitabineCapecitabine monotherapyDurable responseMetastatic breast cancerTreatment efficacy

Identifiers

PMID33471187
PMCPMC11802009
OpenAlexW3121848926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.